Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] PCI/AER: Use _OSC negotiation to determine AER ownership

[Bjorn Helgaas]

[+to Mario, Austin, Rafael; Dell folks, I suspect this commit will
break Dell servers but I'd like your opinion]

On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 07:02:13PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:30:06AM -0700, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Currently PCIe AER driver uses HEST FIRMWARE_FIRST bit to
> > determine the PCIe AER Capability ownership between OS and
> > firmware. This support is added based on following spec
> > reference.
> > 
> > Per ACPI spec r6.3, table 18-387, 18-388, 18-389, HEST table
> > flags field BIT-0 and BIT-1 can be used to expose the
> > ownership of error source between firmware and OSPM.
> > 
> > Bit [0] - FIRMWARE_FIRST: If set, indicates that system
> >           firmware will handle errors from this source
> >           first.
> > Bit [1] â GLOBAL: If set, indicates that the settings
> >           contained in this structure apply globally to all
> >           PCI Express Bridges.
> > 
> > Although above spec reference states that setting
> > FIRMWARE_FIRST bit means firmware will handle the error source
> > first, it does not explicitly state anything about AER
> > ownership. So using HEST to determine AER ownership is
> > incorrect.
> > 
> > Also, as per following specification references, _OSC can be
> > used to negotiate the AER ownership between firmware and OS.
> > Details are,
> > 
> > Per ACPI spec r6.3, sec 6.2.11.3, table titled âInterpretation
> > of _OSC Control Fieldâ and as per PCI firmware specification r3.2,
> > sec 4.5.1, table 4-5, OS can set bit 3 of _OSC control field
> > to request control over PCI Express AER. If the OS successfully
> > receives control of this feature, it must handle error reporting
> > through the AER Capability as described in the PCI Express Base
> > Specification.
> > 
> > Since above spec references clearly states _OSC can be used to
> > determine AER ownership, don't depend on HEST FIRMWARE_FIRST bit.
> 
> I split this up a bit and applied the first part to pci/error to get
> it into -next so we can start seeing what breaks.  I won't be too
> surprised if we trip over something.
> 
> Here's the first part (entire original patch is at
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/67af2931705bed9a588b5a39d369cb70b9942190.1587925636.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx).

I *really* want the patch because the current mix of using both _OSC
and FIRMWARE_FIRST to determine AER capability ownership is a mess and
getting worse, but I'm more and more doubtful.

My contention is that if firmware doesn't want the OS to use the AER
capability it should simply decline to grant control via _OSC.

But things like 0584396157ad ("PCI: PCIe AER: honor ACPI HEST FIRMWARE
FIRST mode") [1] suggest that some machines grant AER control to the
OS via _OSC, but still expect the OS to leave AER alone for certain
devices.

I think the FIRMWARE_FIRST language in the ACPI spec is really too
vague to tell the OS not to use the AER Capability, but it seems like
that's what commits like [1] rely on.

The current _OSC definition (PCI Firmware r3.2) applies only to
PNP0A03/PNP0A08 devices, but it's conceivable that it could be
extended to other devices if we need per-device AER Capability
ownership.

[1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/0584396157ad

> commit 8f8e42e7c2dd ("PCI/AER: Use only _OSC to determine AER ownership")
> Author: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Mon Apr 27 18:25:13 2020 -0500
> 
>     PCI/AER: Use only _OSC to determine AER ownership
>     
>     Per the PCI Firmware spec, r3.2, sec 4.5.1, the OS can request control of
>     AER via bit 3 of the _OSC Control Field.  In the returned value of the
>     Control Field:
>     
>       The firmware sets [bit 3] to 1 to grant control over PCI Express Advanced
>       Error Reporting.  ...  after control is transferred to the operating
>       system, firmware must not modify the Advanced Error Reporting Capability.
>       If control of this feature was requested and denied or was not requested,
>       firmware returns this bit set to 0.
>     
>     Previously the pci_root driver looked at the HEST FIRMWARE_FIRST bit to
>     determine whether to request ownership of the AER Capability.  This was
>     based on ACPI spec v6.3, sec 18.3.2.4, and similar sections, which say
>     things like:
>     
>       Bit [0] - FIRMWARE_FIRST: If set, indicates that system firmware will
>                 handle errors from this source first.
>     
>       Bit [1] - GLOBAL: If set, indicates that the settings contained in this
>                 structure apply globally to all PCI Express Devices.
>     
>     These ACPI references don't say anything about ownership of the AER
>     Capability.
>     
>     Remove use of the FIRMWARE_FIRST bit and rely only on the _OSC bit to
>     determine whether we have control of the AER Capability.
>     
>     Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/67af2931705bed9a588b5a39d369cb70b9942190.1587925636.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     [bhelgaas: commit log, split patches]
>     Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index ac8ad6cb82aa..9e235c1a75ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -483,13 +483,8 @@ static void negotiate_os_control(struct acpi_pci_root *root, int *no_aspm,
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_SHPC))
>  		control |= OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL;
>  
> -	if (pci_aer_available()) {
> -		if (aer_acpi_firmware_first())
> -			dev_info(&device->dev,
> -				 "PCIe AER handled by firmware\n");
> -		else
> -			control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
> -	}
> +	if (pci_aer_available())
> +		control |= OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Per the Downstream Port Containment Related Enhancements ECN to
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> index f4274d301235..efc26773cc6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c
> @@ -318,30 +318,6 @@ int pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(struct pci_dev *dev)
>  		aer_set_firmware_first(dev);
>  	return dev->__aer_firmware_first;
>  }
> -
> -static bool aer_firmware_first;
> -
> -/**
> - * aer_acpi_firmware_first - Check if APEI should control AER.
> - */
> -bool aer_acpi_firmware_first(void)
> -{
> -	static bool parsed = false;
> -	struct aer_hest_parse_info info = {
> -		.pci_dev	= NULL,	/* Check all PCIe devices */
> -		.firmware_first	= 0,
> -	};
> -
> -	if (pcie_ports_native)
> -		return false;
> -
> -	if (!parsed) {
> -		apei_hest_parse(aer_hest_parse, &info);
> -		aer_firmware_first = info.firmware_first;
> -		parsed = true;
> -	}
> -	return aer_firmware_first;
> -}
>  #endif
>  
>  #define	PCI_EXP_AER_FLAGS	(PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_CERE | PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_NFERE | \
> @@ -1523,7 +1499,7 @@ static struct pcie_port_service_driver aerdriver = {
>   */
>  int __init pcie_aer_init(void)
>  {
> -	if (!pci_aer_available() || aer_acpi_firmware_first())
> +	if (!pci_aer_available())
>  		return -ENXIO;
>  	return pcie_port_service_register(&aerdriver);
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> index 2d155bfb8fbf..11c98875538a 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pci-acpi.h
> @@ -125,10 +125,4 @@ static inline void acpi_pci_add_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
>  static inline void acpi_pci_remove_bus(struct pci_bus *bus) { }
>  #endif	/* CONFIG_ACPI */
>  
> -#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI
> -extern bool aer_acpi_firmware_first(void);
> -#else
> -static inline bool aer_acpi_firmware_first(void) { return false; }
> -#endif
> -
>  #endif	/* _PCI_ACPI_H_ */