Re: [PATCH -next] blk-mq: Use BUG_ON() instead of BUG()

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:10:24AM +0800, Zou Wei wrote:
> Fixes coccicheck warning:
> 
>  block/blk-mq.c:546:2-5: WARNING: Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
> 
> Fixes: 63151a449eba ("blk-mq: allow drivers to hook into I/O completion")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <zou_wei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  block/blk-mq.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index bcc3a23..49a227e 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -542,8 +542,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__blk_mq_end_request);
>  
>  void blk_mq_end_request(struct request *rq, blk_status_t error)
>  {
> -	if (blk_update_request(rq, error, blk_rq_bytes(rq)))
> -		BUG();
> +	BUG_ON(blk_update_request(rq, error, blk_rq_bytes(rq)));

I don't think hiding something that actually does do the work in a
BUG_ON ever is a good style.