Re: [PATCH 03/10] efi/x86: Use pr_efi_err for error messages

[Arvind Sankar]

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:45:17PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 23:43, Arvind Sankar <nivedita@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 08:49:21PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > > On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 20:47, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2020-04-29 at 13:41 -0400, Arvind Sankar wrote:
> > > > > Use pr_efi_err instead of bare efi_printk for error messages.
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps it'd be better to rename pr_efi_err to eri_err
> > > > to it's clearer it's a typical efi_ logging function.
> > > >
> > > > $ git grep -w --name-only pr_efi_err | \
> > > >   xargs sed -i 's/\bpr_efi_err\b/efi_err/g'
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yeah, pr_efi_err() is probably not the best name
> >
> > Should I rename pr_efi/pr_efi_err to, say, efi_pr_info/efi_pr_error?
> 
> If you don't mind spinning another couple of patches, yes, that would
> be helpful.

No problem.

> 
> Let's use efi_pr_info and efi_pr_err to stay aligned with the ordinary
> counterparts

Right, for some reason I thought it was pr_error but it's actually
pr_err.