Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc: qcom: ipcc: Add support for IPCC controller

[Manivannan Sadhasivam]

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:45:27PM -0700, rananta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On 2020-04-29 23:30, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > +static int qcom_ipcc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	struct qcom_ipcc_proto_data *proto_data;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	proto_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*proto_data),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!proto_data)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	ipcc_proto_data = proto_data;
> > +	proto_data->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > +
> > +	proto_data->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(proto_data->base)) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to ioremap the ipcc base addr\n");
> > +		return PTR_ERR(proto_data->base);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	proto_data->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > +	if (proto_data->irq < 0) {
> > +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get the IRQ\n");
> > +		return proto_data->irq;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/* Perform a SW reset on this client's protocol state */
> > +	writel(0x1, proto_data->base + IPCC_REG_CLIENT_CLEAR);
> We can skip doing a SW reset here. Few of the subsystems may be brought out
> of reset via the bootloader and the interrupts from them might be pending.
> Doing a SW reset here would clear those interrupts.
> 

Okay, will remove it.

Thanks,
Mani

> Thank you.
> Raghavendra