Re: [PATCH v4 11/11] module: Make module_enable_ro() static again

[Jessica Yu]

+++ Jessica Yu [30/04/20 13:40 +0200]:
> +++ Miroslav Benes [30/04/20 13:35 +0200]:
> > On Thu, 30 Apr 2020, Jessica Yu wrote:
> >
> > > +++ Josh Poimboeuf [29/04/20 10:24 -0500]:
> > > > Now that module_enable_ro() has no more external users, make it static
> > > > again.
> > > >
> > > > Suggested-by: Jessica Yu <jeyu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Thanks! Since this patch is separate from the rest and it's based on
> > > modules-next, I can just take this last patch through the modules tree.
> >
> > It depends on 8/11 of the series.
> >
> > Acked-by: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > for the patch.
>
> Ah yeah, you are right (you meant patch 9/11 right)? Will take both
> through modules-next.

So I'm speaking nonsense apparently. I suggested taking them because
the module patches were based on modules-next. But Miroslav correctly
pointed out that these patches still depend on livepatch removing
module_disable_ro() usage before we can even remove them from
module.c.

So ignore what I said earlier, the whole patchset should be applied
together (I'm assuming the livepatching for-next branch). In any case,
should there be any conflicts with modules-next they should be easy to
resolve. Sorry for the noise!

Jessica