Re: [PATCH] pipe: read/write_iter() handler should check for IOCB_NOWAIT
From: Jens Axboe
Date: Thu Apr 30 2020 - 15:52:04 EST
On 4/30/20 12:47 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/30/20 11:58 AM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:24:46AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> Pipe read/write only checks for the file O_NONBLOCK flag, but we should
>>> also check for IOCB_NOWAIT for whether or not we should handle this read
>>> or write in a non-blocking fashion. If we don't, then we will block on
>>> data or space for iocbs that explicitly asked for non-blocking
>>> operation. This messes up callers that explicitly ask for non-blocking
>>> operations.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Wouldn't this be better?
>
> Yeah, that's probably a better idea. Care to send a "proper" patch?
I take that back, running into issues going with a whole-sale conversion
like that:
mkdir("/run/dhcpcd", 0755) = -1 EEXIST (File exists)
openat(AT_FDCWD, "/run/dhcpcd/ens7.pid", O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_NONBLOCK|O_CLOEXEC, 0644) = 4
flock(4, LOCK_EX|LOCK_NB) = 0
getpid() = 214
ftruncate(4, 0) = 0
lseek(4, 0, SEEK_SET) = 0
fstat(4, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
lseek(4, 0, SEEK_CUR) = 0
write(4, "214\n", 4) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
which I don't know where is coming from yet, but it's definitely
breakage by auto setting IOCB_NOWAIT if O_NONBLOCK is set.
I'd prefer to go your route, but I also would like this fixed for pipes
for 5.7. So I'd suggest we go with mine, and then investigate why this
is breaking stuff and go with the all-in approach for 5.8 if feasible.
--
Jens Axboe