On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 10:07:05AM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
SNIP
init_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats);
update_stats(&walltime_nsecs_stats, stat_config.interval * 1000000);
print_counters(&rs, 0, NULL);
+ walltime_nsecs_stats = walltime_nsecs_stats_bak;
}
static void enable_counters(void)
@@ -732,7 +735,14 @@ static int __run_perf_stat(int argc, const char **argv, int run_idx)
* avoid arbitrary skew, we must read all counters before closing any
* group leaders.
*/
- read_counters(&(struct timespec) { .tv_nsec = t1-t0 });
+ if (!interval)
+ read_counters(&(struct timespec) { .tv_nsec = t1-t0 });
+ else {
+ stat_config.interval = 0;
+ stat_config.summary = true;
+ perf_evlist__copy_summary_counts(evsel_list);
+ perf_evlist__process_summary_counts(&stat_config, evsel_list);
I think keeping the summary and copying it to evsel->count is ok,
but when we pretend to have new counts in place, could we process
it with perf_stat_process_counter function? so we keep just
1 processing code?
perhaps have some setup functions for non-interval settings?
SNIP
+
+ evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr = evsel->summary_counts->aggr;
+}
+
+void perf_evlist__copy_summary_counts(struct evlist *evlist)
+{
+ struct evsel *evsel;
+
+ evlist__for_each_entry(evlist, evsel)
+ perf_evsel__copy_summary_counts(evsel);
+}
+
+static void perf_stat_process_summary_counts(struct perf_stat_config *config,
+ struct evsel *evsel)
+{
+ struct perf_counts_values *summary = &evsel->summary_counts->aggr;
as I said earlier, why not copy all summary_counts data into 'counts'
and use the current code the process and display the result?
thanks,
jirka
+ struct perf_stat_evsel *ps = evsel->stats;
+ u64 *count = evsel->summary_counts->aggr.values;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!config->summary || config->aggr_mode != AGGR_GLOBAL)
+ return;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+ init_stats(&ps->res_stats[i]);
+
+ perf_counts_values__scale(summary, config->scale,
+ &evsel->summary_counts->scaled);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
SNIP