[PATCH v2 01/12] bus/fsl-mc: Do no longer export the total number of irqs outside dprc_scan_objects

From: Diana Craciun
Date: Thu May 07 2020 - 03:36:28 EST


The total number of interrupts is only used for some checks
outside the dprc_scan_objects function. Furthermore, in some
situations the check is made twice. Move the bounds check inside
the function for all situations.

Signed-off-by: Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c | 30 ++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c
index c8b1c3842c1a..035b220779d0 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
* Freescale data path resource container (DPRC) driver
*
* Copyright (C) 2014-2016 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
+ * Copyright 2019-2020 NXP
* Author: German Rivera <German.Rivera@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*
*/
@@ -197,8 +198,6 @@ static void dprc_add_new_devices(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_bus_dev,
* dprc_scan_objects - Discover objects in a DPRC
*
* @mc_bus_dev: pointer to the fsl-mc device that represents a DPRC object
- * @total_irq_count: If argument is provided the function populates the
- * total number of IRQs created by objects in the DPRC.
*
* Detects objects added and removed from a DPRC and synchronizes the
* state of the Linux bus driver, MC by adding and removing
@@ -212,8 +211,7 @@ static void dprc_add_new_devices(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_bus_dev,
* populated before they can get allocation requests from probe callbacks
* of the device drivers for the non-allocatable devices.
*/
-static int dprc_scan_objects(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_bus_dev,
- unsigned int *total_irq_count)
+static int dprc_scan_objects(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_bus_dev)
{
int num_child_objects;
int dprc_get_obj_failures;
@@ -294,22 +292,21 @@ static int dprc_scan_objects(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_bus_dev,
* Allocate IRQ's before binding the scanned devices with their
* respective drivers.
*/
- if (dev_get_msi_domain(&mc_bus_dev->dev) && !mc_bus->irq_resources) {
+ if (dev_get_msi_domain(&mc_bus_dev->dev)) {
if (irq_count > FSL_MC_IRQ_POOL_MAX_TOTAL_IRQS) {
dev_warn(&mc_bus_dev->dev,
"IRQs needed (%u) exceed IRQs preallocated (%u)\n",
irq_count, FSL_MC_IRQ_POOL_MAX_TOTAL_IRQS);
}

- error = fsl_mc_populate_irq_pool(mc_bus,
+ if (!mc_bus->irq_resources) {
+ error = fsl_mc_populate_irq_pool(mc_bus,
FSL_MC_IRQ_POOL_MAX_TOTAL_IRQS);
- if (error < 0)
- return error;
+ if (error < 0)
+ return error;
+ }
}

- if (total_irq_count)
- *total_irq_count = irq_count;
-
dprc_remove_devices(mc_bus_dev, child_obj_desc_array,
num_child_objects);

@@ -342,7 +339,7 @@ static int dprc_scan_container(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_bus_dev)
* Discover objects in the DPRC:
*/
mutex_lock(&mc_bus->scan_mutex);
- error = dprc_scan_objects(mc_bus_dev, NULL);
+ error = dprc_scan_objects(mc_bus_dev);
mutex_unlock(&mc_bus->scan_mutex);
if (error < 0) {
fsl_mc_cleanup_all_resource_pools(mc_bus_dev);
@@ -411,9 +408,8 @@ static irqreturn_t dprc_irq0_handler_thread(int irq_num, void *arg)
DPRC_IRQ_EVENT_CONTAINER_DESTROYED |
DPRC_IRQ_EVENT_OBJ_DESTROYED |
DPRC_IRQ_EVENT_OBJ_CREATED)) {
- unsigned int irq_count;

- error = dprc_scan_objects(mc_dev, &irq_count);
+ error = dprc_scan_objects(mc_dev);
if (error < 0) {
/*
* If the error is -ENXIO, we ignore it, as it indicates
@@ -428,12 +424,6 @@ static irqreturn_t dprc_irq0_handler_thread(int irq_num, void *arg)

goto out;
}
-
- if (irq_count > FSL_MC_IRQ_POOL_MAX_TOTAL_IRQS) {
- dev_warn(dev,
- "IRQs needed (%u) exceed IRQs preallocated (%u)\n",
- irq_count, FSL_MC_IRQ_POOL_MAX_TOTAL_IRQS);
- }
}

out:
--
2.17.1