Re: [PATCH v10 05/26] x86/cet/shstk: Add Kconfig option for user-mode Shadow Stack

[Yu-cheng Yu]

On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 08:55 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 4/29/20 3:07 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> > +config X86_INTEL_SHADOW_STACK_USER
> > +	prompt "Intel Shadow Stacks for user-mode"
> > +	def_bool n
> > +	depends on CPU_SUP_INTEL && X86_64
> > +	depends on AS_HAS_SHADOW_STACK
> > +	select ARCH_USES_HIGH_VMA_FLAGS
> > +	select X86_INTEL_CET
> > +	select ARCH_HAS_SHADOW_STACK
> 
> I called protection keys: X86_INTEL_MEMORY_PROTECTION_KEYS
> 
> AMD recently posted documentation which shows them implementing it as
> well.  The "INTEL_" is feeling now like a mistake.
> 
> Going forward, we should probably avoid sticking the company name on
> them, if for no other reason than avoiding confusion and/or churn in the
> future.
> 
> Shadow stacks, for instance, seem like something that another vendor
> might implement one day.  So, let's at least remove the "INTEL_" from
> the config option names themselves.  Mentioning Intel in the changelog
> and the Kconfig help text is fine.

Yes, sure.

Yu-cheng