Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] pstore/blk: new support logger for block devices

From: WeiXiong Liao
Date: Fri May 08 2020 - 08:47:14 EST


hi Kees Cook,

On 2020/5/8 PM 2:07, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 04:54:57PM +0800, WeiXiong Liao wrote:
>> pstore/blk is similar to pstore/ram, but dump log to block device
>> rather than persistent ram.
>> [...]
>> +int psblk_register_blkdev(unsigned int major, psblk_panic_write_op panic_write)
>> +{
>> + struct block_device *bdev;
>> + struct psblk_device dev = {0};
>> + struct bdev_info *binfo;
>> + int ret = -ENODEV;
>> + void *holder = blkdev;
>> +
>> + binfo = psblk_get_bdev_info();
>> + if (IS_ERR(binfo))
>> + return PTR_ERR(binfo);
>> +
>> + /* only allow driver matching the @blkdev */
>> + if (!binfo->devt || MAJOR(binfo->devt) != major) {
>> + pr_debug("invalid major %u (expect %u)\n",
>> + major, MAJOR(binfo->devt));
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* hold bdev exclusively */
>> + bdev = psblk_get_bdev(holder);
>> + if (IS_ERR(bdev)) {
>> + pr_err("failed to open '%s'!\n", blkdev);
>> + return PTR_ERR(bdev);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* psblk_bdev must be assigned before register to pstore/blk */
>> + psblk_bdev = bdev;
>> + blkdev_panic_write = panic_write;
>> +
>> + dev.total_size = psblk_bdev_size(bdev);
>> + dev.panic_write = panic_write ? psblk_blk_panic_write : NULL;
>> + dev.read = psblk_generic_blk_read;
>> + dev.write = psblk_generic_blk_write;
>> +
>> + ret = psblk_register_do(&dev);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto err_put_bdev;
>> +
>> + pr_info("using '%s'\n", blkdev);
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_put_bdev:
>> + psblk_bdev = NULL;
>> + blkdev_panic_write = NULL;
>> + psblk_put_bdev(bdev, holder);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(psblk_register_blkdev);
>
> I've gotten this series refactored on top of current pstore, and I've
> been making various bikeshed changes to names, etc, and as I went to go
> start testing, I realized that nothing actually uses
> psblk_register_blkdev().
>
> It seems like it should be possible to just start using this on any
> block device of the user's choosing. I assume the idea is to allow for
> drivers to register panic_write handlers, but even without that, it'd be
> nice to just be able to test this with something like /dev/loop0.
>

Yes. psblk_register_blkdev() is there for block drivers to register
panic_write()
handlers. The panic_wrire() is used only when panic occurs. Not only the
panic
log, but also all data on dirty zones. I implement the panic_write() of mmc
and nand on the platform of Allwinner, but I think it is not ready to
submit to
community.

All other front-ends but dmesg for panic are available since pstore/blk
provides
the general write/read through IO stack. That's why /dev/loop0 seemed to
works well.

> What's your thinking on how this would happen? It seems like if
> pstore/blk uses pstore/zone, and mtdpstore uses pstore/blk, there should
> be a blkoops that uses pstore/blk too? I guess I need to learn a bit> more about how block device probing works so pstore/blk can notice
> devices as they're brought online, etc.
>

pstore/blk provides all user options and register function for device
drivers.
The mtdpstore is the implementation case using pstore/blk. How about
'mmc_pstore' for mmc and *_pstore for others block device?

I guess I need to learn more about how pstore/blk can notice devices too.
I think pstore/blk can be better if block device can do like mtd device that
not only notifies but also provides generic panic_write().

--
WeiXiong Liao