Re: [PATCH] memory/samsung: reduce unnecessary mutex lock area

[Markus Elfring]

> Maybe dmc->df->lock is unnecessary to protect function
> exynos5_dmc_perf_events_check(dmc). If we have to protect,
> dmc->lock is more better and more effective.
> Also, it seems not needed to protect "if (ret) & dev_warn"
> branch.

I suggest to improve also this commit message.

* Please reduce uncertainty.

* An imperative wording is probably preferred, isn't it?

* Will it be more appropriate to refer to the action âReduce the lock scopeâ?

* Would you like to add the tag âFixesâ to the change description?

Regards,
Markus