On Thu, 7 May 2020 18:22:27 +0000 Luo bin wrote:
if some function in ndo_stop interface returns failure because ofThe code looks good, but would it make sense to split this patch into
hardware fault, must go on excuting rest steps rather than return
failure directly, otherwise will cause memory leak
Signed-off-by: Luo bin <luobin9@xxxxxxxxxx>
two? First one that ignores the return values on close path with these
fixes tags:
Fixes: e2585ea77538 ("net-next/hinic: Add Rx handler")
Fixes: c4d06d2d208a ("net-next/hinic: Add Rx mode and link event handler")
And a separate patch which bumps the timeout for SET_FUNC_STATE? Right
now you don't even mention the timeout changes in the commit message.
.