Re: [PATCH] perf evsel: Get group fd from CPU0 for system wide event

From: Jin, Yao
Date: Sat May 09 2020 - 03:37:24 EST


Hi Jiri,

On 5/5/2020 8:03 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 10:33:59AM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:

SNIP

@@ -1461,6 +1461,9 @@ static int get_group_fd(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu, int thread)
BUG_ON(!leader->core.fd);
fd = FD(leader, cpu, thread);
+ if (fd == -1 && leader->core.system_wide)

fd does not need to be -1 in here.. in my setup cstate_pkg/c2-residency/
has cpumask 0, so other cpus never get open and are 0, and the whole thing
ends up with:

sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 1 group_fd 0 flags 0
sys_perf_event_open failed, error -9

I actualy thought we put -1 to fd array but couldn't find it.. perhaps we should od that



I have tested on two platforms. On KBL desktop fd is 0 for this case, but on
oncascadelakex server, fd is -1, so the BUG_ON(fd == -1) is triggered.

+ fd = FD(leader, 0, thread);
+

so how do we group following events?

cstate_pkg/c2-residency/ - cpumask 0
msr/tsc/ - all cpus


Not sure if it's enough to only use cpumask 0 because
cstate_pkg/c2-residency/ should be per-socket.

cpu 0 is fine.. the rest I have no idea ;-)


Perhaps we directly remove the BUG_ON(fd == -1) assertion?

I think we need to make clear how to deal with grouping over
events that comes for different cpus

so how do we group following events?

cstate_pkg/c2-residency/ - cpumask 0
msr/tsc/ - all cpus


what's the reason/expected output of groups with above events?
seems to make sense only if we limit msr/tsc/ to cpumask 0 as well

jirka


On 2-socket machine (e.g cascadelakex), "cstate_pkg/c2-residency/" is per-socket event and the cpumask is 0 and 24.

root@lkp-csl-2sp5 /sys/devices/cstate_pkg# cat cpumask
0,24

We can't limit it to cpumask 0. It should be programmed on CPU0 and CPU24 (the first CPU on each socket).

The "msr/tsc" are per-cpu event, it should be programmed on all cpus. So I don't think we can limit msr/tsc to cpumask 0.

The issue is how we deal with get_group_fd().

static int get_group_fd(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu, int thread)
{
struct evsel *leader = evsel->leader;
int fd;

if (evsel__is_group_leader(evsel))
return -1;

/*
* Leader must be already processed/open,
* if not it's a bug.
*/
BUG_ON(!leader->core.fd);

fd = FD(leader, cpu, thread);
BUG_ON(fd == -1);

return fd;
}

When evsel is "msr/tsc/",

FD(leader, 0, 0) is 3 (3 is the fd of "cstate_pkg/c2-residency/" on CPU0)
FD(leader, 1, 0) is -1
BUG_ON asserted.

If we just return group_fd(-1) for "msr/tsc", it looks like it's not a problem, is it?

Thanks
Jin Yao