Re: [PATCH v1 00/15] Add support for Nitro Enclaves

[Pavel Machek]

On Fri 2020-05-08 10:00:27, Paraschiv, Andra-Irina wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/05/2020 20:44, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >
> >Hi!
> >
> >>>it uses its own memory and CPUs + its virtio-vsock emulated device for
> >>>communication with the primary VM.
> >>>
> >>>The memory and CPUs are carved out of the primary VM, they are dedicated
> >>>for the enclave. The Nitro hypervisor running on the host ensures memory
> >>>and CPU isolation between the primary VM and the enclave VM.
> >>>
> >>>These two components need to reflect the same state e.g. when the
> >>>enclave abstraction process (1) is terminated, the enclave VM (2) is
> >>>terminated as well.
> >>>
> >>>With regard to the communication channel, the primary VM has its own
> >>>emulated virtio-vsock PCI device. The enclave VM has its own emulated
> >>>virtio-vsock device as well. This channel is used, for example, to fetch
> >>>data in the enclave and then process it. An application that sets up the
> >>>vsock socket and connects or listens, depending on the use case, is then
> >>>developed to use this channel; this happens on both ends - primary VM
> >>>and enclave VM.
> >>>
> >>>Let me know if further clarifications are needed.
> >>Thanks, this is all useful.  However can you please clarify the
> >>low-level details here?
> >Is the virtual machine manager open-source? If so, I guess pointer for sources
> >would be useful.
> 
> Hi Pavel,
> 
> Thanks for reaching out.
> 
> The VMM that is used for the primary / parent VM is not open source.

Do we want to merge code that opensource community can not test?

								Pavel

-- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) 
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html