Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] lib/test_sysctl: support testing of sysctl. boot parameter

[Luis Chamberlain]

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 01:05:22PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> 
> On 4/27/20 8:39 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 08:04:33PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > Nice, also we could just require
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/config b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/config
> > index 6ca14800d755..34461cc99a2b 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/config
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/config
> > @@ -1 +1,3 @@
> >  CONFIG_TEST_SYSCTL=y
> > +CONFIG_IKCONFIG=y
> > +CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC=y
> > 
> > tools/testing/selftests/firmware/fw_lib.sh then has a kconfig_has()
> > which can verify the exact config.
> 
> Hmm but it also has a (firmware area specific) fallback for case where
> IKCONFIG_PROC doesn't exist. So it's simpler to just keep checking the module
> dir, IMHO, as that would be the fallback. 

As you wish.

> >> +
> >> +	echo -n "Testing if $TARGET is set to 1 ..."
> >> +	ORIG=$(cat "${TARGET}")
> > 
> > This would fail if someone uses this script to test an older kernel, and
> > the scripts in selftests are supposed to work with older kernels.
> 
> Oh, I didn't know that it's supposed to.

Yeap, that's how they are used.

> > One
> > way to address this would be to just see if the file exists first and
> > ignore the test if the $SYSCTL directory exists but the file $TARGET
> > does not.
> > 
> > For now we can just do this:
> > 
> > if [ ! -d $TARGET ]; then
> > 	echo "Skipping test for $TARGET as it is not present ..."
> > 	return 0
> > fi
> 
> OK, just the -d test needs to be fixed :) Andrew can you please apply:
> 
> ----8<----
> From a999e993a89e521b152bbd4b1466f69e62879c30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 12:59:49 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] lib/test_sysctl: support testing of sysctl. boot parameter -
>  fix
> 
> Skip the new test if boot_int sysctl is not present, otherwise, per Luis,
> "This would fail if someone uses this script to test an older kernel, and
> the scripts in selftests are supposed to work with older kernels."
> 
> Suggested-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
> index ef6417b8067b..148704f465b5 100755
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh
> @@ -756,6 +756,11 @@ sysctl_test_0006()

You want to:

                                                                                
# Kselftest framework requirement - SKIP code is 4.                             
ksft_skip=4 

>  sysctl_test_0007()
>  {
>  	TARGET="${SYSCTL}/boot_int"
> +	if [ ! -f $TARGET ]; then
> +		echo "Skipping test for $TARGET as it is not present ..."
> +		return 0
> +	fi

And return 4 instead.

  Luis
> +
>  	if [ -d $DIR ]; then
>  		echo "Boot param test only possible sysctl_test is built-in, not module:"
>  		cat $TEST_DIR/config >&2
> -- 
> 2.26.2
>