Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] Historical Service Time Path Selector

[Gabriel Krisman Bertazi]

Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> OK, that concall's issue had nothing to do with needing higher
> resolution time (was about IOPs realized with requested-based vs
> bio-based).
>
> Reality is, DM won't need anything higher resolution than jiffies until
> block core's interfaces require something other than jiffies
> (e.g. generic_end_io_acct).
>
> So feel free to proceed with the conditional time fetch solution you
> were going to run with (prior to my previous mail asking you to hold
> off).
>
> Sorry for the noise.  Thanks,
> Mike

No problem, thanks for the information.  I get started on it.


-- 
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi