Re: [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: Add inline coredump functionality

From: rishabhb
Date: Mon May 11 2020 - 20:42:19 EST

Next message: Jason A. Donenfeld: "Re: [PATCH v2] Kconfig: default to CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE_O3 for gcc >= 10"
Previous message: Bjorn Andersson: "Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: socinfo: add msm8936/39 and apq8036/39 soc ids"
In reply to: Bjorn Andersson: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: Add inline coredump functionality"
Next in thread: Bjorn Andersson: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: Add inline coredump functionality"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 2020-05-11 17:30, Bjorn Andersson wrote:

On Mon 11 May 17:11 PDT 2020, rishabhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 2020-05-07 13:21, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 16 Apr 11:38 PDT 2020, Rishabh Bhatnagar wrote:
>
> > This patch adds the inline coredump functionality. The current
> > coredump implementation uses vmalloc area to copy all the segments.
> > But this might put a lot of strain on low memory targets as the
> > firmware size sometimes is in ten's of MBs. The situation becomes
> > worse if there are multiple remote processors undergoing recovery
> > at the same time. This patch directly copies the device memory to
> > userspace buffer and avoids extra memory usage. This requires
> > recovery to be halted until data is read by userspace and free
> > function is called.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_coredump.c | 130
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h | 23 +++++-
> > include/linux/remoteproc.h | 2 +
> > 3 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_coredump.c
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_coredump.c
> > index 9de0467..888b7dec91 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_coredump.c
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_coredump.c
> > @@ -12,6 +12,84 @@
> > #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
> > #include "remoteproc_internal.h"
> >
> > +static void rproc_free_dump(void *data)
>
> rproc_coredump_free()
>
> > +{
> > + struct rproc_coredump_state *dump_state = data;
> > +
> > + complete(&dump_state->dump_done);
>
> vfree(dump_state->header);
>
> > +}
> > +
> > +static unsigned long resolve_addr(loff_t user_offset,
>
> rproc_coredump_find_segment()
>
> > + struct list_head *segments,
> > + unsigned long *data_left)
> > +{
> > + struct rproc_dump_segment *segment;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(segment, segments, node) {
> > + if (user_offset >= segment->size)
> > + user_offset -= segment->size;
> > + else
> > + break;
>
> if (user_offset < segment->size) {
> *data_left = segment->size - user_offset;
> return segment->da + user_offset;
> }
>
> user_offset -= segment->size;
> > + }
>
> *data_left = 0;
> return 0;
>
> > +
> > + if (&segment->node == segments) {
> > + *data_left = 0;
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + *data_left = segment->size - user_offset;
> > +
> > + return segment->da + user_offset;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t rproc_read_dump(char *buffer, loff_t offset, size_t
> > count,
> > + void *data, size_t header_size)
> > +{
> > + void *device_mem;
> > + size_t data_left, copy_size, bytes_left = count;
> > + unsigned long addr;
> > + struct rproc_coredump_state *dump_state = data;
> > + struct rproc *rproc = dump_state->rproc;
> > + void *elfcore = dump_state->header;
> > +
> > + /* Copy the header first */
> > + if (offset < header_size) {
> > + copy_size = header_size - offset;
> > + copy_size = min(copy_size, bytes_left);
> > +
> > + memcpy(buffer, elfcore + offset, copy_size);
> > + offset += copy_size;
> > + bytes_left -= copy_size;
> > + buffer += copy_size;
> > + }
>
> Perhaps you can take inspiration from devcd_readv() here?
>
> > +
> > + while (bytes_left) {
> > + addr = resolve_addr(offset - header_size,
> > + &rproc->dump_segments, &data_left);
> > + /* EOF check */
> > + if (data_left == 0) {
>
> Afaict data_left denotes the amount of data left in this particular
> segment, rather than in the entire core.
>
Yes, but it only returns 0 when the final segment has been copied
completely. Otherwise it gives data left to copy for every segment
and moves to next segment once the current one is copied.

You're right.

> I think you should start by making bytes_left the minimum of the core
> size and @count and then have this loop as long as bytes_left, copying
> data to the buffer either from header or an appropriate segment based on
> the current offset.
>
That would require an extra function that calculates entire core size,
as its not available right now. Do you see any missed corner cases with this
approach?

You're looping over all the segments as you're building the header
anyways, so you could simply store this in the dump_state. I think this
depend more on the ability to reuse the read function between inline and
default coredump.

Regards,
Bjorn

Wouldn't the first if condition take care of "default" dump as it is?
The header_size in that case would involve the 'header + all segments'.

> > + pr_info("Ramdump complete %lld bytes read", offset);
>
> dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, ...)
>
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + copy_size = min_t(size_t, bytes_left, data_left);
> > +
> > + device_mem = rproc->ops->da_to_va(rproc, addr, copy_size);
>
> rproc_da_to_va()
>
> > + if (!device_mem) {
> > + pr_err("Address:%lx with size %zd out of remoteproc carveout\n",
>
> dev_err(&rproc->dev, "coredump: %#lx size %#zx outside of carveouts\n",
> ..);
>
> > + addr, copy_size);
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > + }
> > + memcpy(buffer, device_mem, copy_size);
> > +
> > + offset += copy_size;
> > + buffer += copy_size;
> > + bytes_left -= copy_size;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return count - bytes_left;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void create_elf_header(void *data, int phnum, struct rproc
> > *rproc)
> > {
> > struct elf32_phdr *phdr;
> > @@ -55,6 +133,58 @@ static void create_elf_header(void *data, int
> > phnum, struct rproc *rproc)
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > + * rproc_inline_coredump() - perform synchronized coredump
> > + * @rproc: rproc handle
> > + *
> > + * This function will generate an ELF header for the registered
> > segments
> > + * and create a devcoredump device associated with rproc. This
> > function
> > + * directly copies the segments from device memory to userspace. The
> > + * recovery is stalled until the enitire coredump is read. This
> > approach
> > + * avoids using extra vmalloc memory(which can be really large).
> > + */
> > +void rproc_inline_coredump(struct rproc *rproc)
> > +{
> > + struct rproc_dump_segment *segment;
> > + struct elf32_phdr *phdr;
> > + struct elf32_hdr *ehdr;
> > + struct rproc_coredump_state *dump_state;
>
> This can live on the stack, unless you follow my suggestion below...
>
> > + size_t header_size;
> > + void *data;
> > + int phnum = 0;
> > +
> > + if (list_empty(&rproc->dump_segments))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + header_size = sizeof(*ehdr);
> > + list_for_each_entry(segment, &rproc->dump_segments, node) {
> > + header_size += sizeof(*phdr);
> > +
> > + phnum++;
> > + }
> > +
> > + data = vmalloc(header_size);
> > + if (!data)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + ehdr = data;
>
> ehdr is unused.
>
> > + create_elf_header(data, phnum, rproc);
> > +
> > + dump_state = kzalloc(sizeof(*dump_state), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + dump_state->rproc = rproc;
> > + dump_state->header = data;
> > + init_completion(&dump_state->dump_done);
> > +
> > + dev_coredumpm(&rproc->dev, NULL, dump_state, header_size,
> > GFP_KERNEL,
> > + rproc_read_dump, rproc_free_dump);
>
> I can help feeling that if you vmalloc() either the header or the entire
> thing depending on DEFAULT vs INLINE and populate it with either all
> segments or just the header, then you should be able to use the same
> (custom) read function to serve both cases.
>
> You should by doing this be able to avoid some duplication, your two
> code paths would not diverge and the main difference would be if you
> wait or not below (the kfree would have to go in the rproc_free_dump).
>
> > +
> > + /* Wait until the dump is read and free is called */
> > + wait_for_completion(&dump_state->dump_done);
> > +
> > + kfree(dump_state);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_inline_coredump);
> > +
> > +/**
> > * rproc_default_coredump() - perform coredump
> > * @rproc: rproc handle
> > *
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > index 28b6af2..ea6146e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_internal.h
> > @@ -24,6 +24,18 @@ struct rproc_debug_trace {
> > struct rproc_mem_entry trace_mem;
> > };
> >
> > +struct rproc_coredump_state {
>
> This is only used within remoteproc_coredump.c, so please move it there.
>
> > + struct rproc *rproc;
> > + void *header;
> > + struct completion dump_done;
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum rproc_coredump_conf {
>
> How about rproc_coredump_mechanism?
>
> > + COREDUMP_DEFAULT,
> > + COREDUMP_INLINE,
> > + COREDUMP_DISABLED,
> > +};
> > +
> > /* from remoteproc_core.c */
> > void rproc_release(struct kref *kref);
> > irqreturn_t rproc_vq_interrupt(struct rproc *rproc, int vq_id);
> > @@ -49,6 +61,7 @@ struct dentry *rproc_create_trace_file(const char
> > *name, struct rproc *rproc,
> >
> > /* from remoteproc_coredump.c */
> > void rproc_default_coredump(struct rproc *rproc);
> > +void rproc_inline_coredump(struct rproc *rproc);
> >
> > void rproc_free_vring(struct rproc_vring *rvring);
> > int rproc_alloc_vring(struct rproc_vdev *rvdev, int i);
> > @@ -125,8 +138,14 @@ struct resource_table
> > *rproc_find_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc,
> > static inline
> > void rproc_coredump(struct rproc *rproc)
> > {
> > - return rproc_default_coredump(rproc);
> > -
> > + switch (rproc->coredump_conf) {
> > + case COREDUMP_DEFAULT:
> > + return rproc_default_coredump(rproc);
> > + case COREDUMP_INLINE:
> > + return rproc_inline_coredump(rproc);
> > + default:
> > + break;
> > + }
>
> I think this better belong inside remoteproc_coredump.c
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
> > }
> >
> > #endif /* REMOTEPROC_INTERNAL_H */
> > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > index 16ad666..23298ce 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
> > @@ -459,6 +459,7 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {
> > * @dev: virtual device for refcounting and common remoteproc
> > behavior
> > * @power: refcount of users who need this rproc powered up
> > * @state: state of the device
> > + * @coredump_conf: Currenlty selected coredump configuration
> > * @lock: lock which protects concurrent manipulations of the rproc
> > * @dbg_dir: debugfs directory of this rproc device
> > * @traces: list of trace buffers
> > @@ -492,6 +493,7 @@ struct rproc {
> > struct device dev;
> > atomic_t power;
> > unsigned int state;
> > + unsigned int coredump_conf;
> > struct mutex lock;
> > struct dentry *dbg_dir;
> > struct list_head traces;
> > --
> > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
> > Forum,
> > a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

Next message: Jason A. Donenfeld: "Re: [PATCH v2] Kconfig: default to CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE_O3 for gcc >= 10"
Previous message: Bjorn Andersson: "Re: [PATCH v2] soc: qcom: socinfo: add msm8936/39 and apq8036/39 soc ids"
In reply to: Bjorn Andersson: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: Add inline coredump functionality"
Next in thread: Bjorn Andersson: "Re: [PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: Add inline coredump functionality"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]