[PATCH 5/5] arm64: perf: Add cap_user_time_short

[Peter Zijlstra]

This completes the ARM64 cap_user_time support.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c |   12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1173,6 +1173,7 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct pe
 
 	userpg->cap_user_time = 0;
 	userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 0;
+	userpg->cap_user_time_short = 0;
 
 	do {
 		rd = sched_clock_read_begin(&seq);
@@ -1183,13 +1184,13 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct pe
 		userpg->time_mult = rd->mult;
 		userpg->time_shift = rd->shift;
 		userpg->time_zero = rd->epoch_ns;
+		userpg->time_cycle = rd->epoch_cyc;
+		userpg->time_mask = rd->sched_clock_mask;
 
 		/*
-		 * This isn't strictly correct, the ARM64 counter can be
-		 * 'short' and then we get funnies when it wraps. The correct
-		 * thing would be to extend the perf ABI with a cycle and mask
-		 * value, but because wrapping on ARM64 is very rare in
-		 * practise this 'works'.
+		 * Subtract the cycle base, such that software that
+		 * doesn't know about cap_user_time_short still 'works'
+		 * assuming no wraps.
 		 */
 		userpg->time_zero -= (rd->epoch_cyc * rd->mult) >> rd->shift;
 
@@ -1214,4 +1215,5 @@ void arch_perf_update_userpage(struct pe
 	 */
 	userpg->cap_user_time = 1;
 	userpg->cap_user_time_zero = 1;
+	userpg->cap_user_time_short = 1;
 }