Re: [Patch v2] efi: cper: Add support for printing Firmware Error Record Reference
From: Punit Agrawal
Date: Tue May 12 2020 - 22:37:02 EST
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 06:55, Punit Agrawal
> <punit1.agrawal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> While debugging a boot failure, the following unknown error record was
>> seen in the boot logs.
>>
>> <...>
>> BERT: Error records from previous boot:
>> [Hardware Error]: event severity: fatal
>> [Hardware Error]: Error 0, type: fatal
>> [Hardware Error]: section type: unknown, 81212a96-09ed-4996-9471-8d729c8e69ed
>> [Hardware Error]: section length: 0x290
>> [Hardware Error]: 00000000: 00000001 00000000 00000000 00020002 ................
>> [Hardware Error]: 00000010: 00020002 0000001f 00000320 00000000 ........ .......
>> [Hardware Error]: 00000020: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................
>> [Hardware Error]: 00000030: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 ................
>> <...>
>>
>> On further investigation, it was found that the error record with
>> UUID (81212a96-09ed-4996-9471-8d729c8e69ed) has been defined in the
>> UEFI Specification at least since v2.4 and has recently had additional
>> fields defined in v2.7 Section N.2.10 Firmware Error Record Reference.
>>
>> Add support for parsing and printing the defined fields to give users
>> a chance to figure out what went wrong.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: linux-efi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ---
>> Hi Ard,
>>
>> I've updated the patch based on your feedback.
>>
>> As you noted, some aspects of the spec make it a bit tricky to support
>> all revisions in a nice way (e.g., size check) but this version should
>> fix existing issues.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Punit
>>
>> v1[0] -> v2:
>> * Simplified error record structure definition
>> * Fixed size check
>> * Added comment to clarify offset calculation for dumped data
>> * Style fixes for multiline if blocks
>
> Thanks. I will queue this as a fix.
Thanks!
Just for my understanding - are you planning to send this for v5.7 or
v5.8? There's no rush, so I am fine either ways.
[...]