Just a quick note..Absolutely! I just wrote the code exactly the way I did the Math on paper,
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 07:40:55PM +0530, Pratik Rajesh Sampat wrote:
+ /*100 is a crap number to divide by as a computer. We bio-puddings happend
+ * Rearrange the weight distribution of the state, increase the weight
+ * by the LEARNING RATE % for the idle state that was supposed to be
+ * chosen and reduce by the same amount for rest of the states
+ *
+ * If the weights are greater than (100 - LEARNING_RATE) % or lesser
+ * than LEARNING_RATE %, do not increase or decrease the confidence
+ * respectively
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
+ unsigned int delta;
+
+ if (idx == -1)
+ break;
+ if (i == idx) {
+ delta = (LEARNING_RATE * cpu_data->state_mat[last_idx][i]) / 100;
to have 10 digits, so 100 makes sense to us, but it does not to our
binary friends.