Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] scsi: ufs: Fix WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend

From: Asutosh Das (asd)
Date: Wed May 13 2020 - 15:31:45 EST


On 5/12/2020 3:47 AM, Stanley Chu wrote:
Currently UFS host driver promises VCC supply if UFS device
needs to do WriteBooster flush during runtime suspend.

However the UFS specification mentions,

"While the flushing operation is in progress, the device is
in Active power mode."

Therefore UFS host driver needs to promise more: Keep UFS
device as "Active power mode", otherwise UFS device shall not
do any flush if device enters Sleep or PowerDown power mode.

Fix this by not changing device power mode if WriteBooster
flush is required in ufshcd_suspend().

Signed-off-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 1 -
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
index b3135344ab3f..9e4bc2e97ada 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
@@ -577,7 +577,6 @@ struct ufs_dev_info {
u32 d_ext_ufs_feature_sup;
u8 b_wb_buffer_type;
u32 d_wb_alloc_units;
- bool keep_vcc_on;
u8 b_presrv_uspc_en;
};
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 169a3379e468..2d0aff8ac260 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -8101,8 +8101,7 @@ static void ufshcd_vreg_set_lpm(struct ufs_hba *hba)
!hba->dev_info.is_lu_power_on_wp) {
ufshcd_setup_vreg(hba, false);
} else if (!ufshcd_is_ufs_dev_active(hba)) {
- if (!hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on)
- ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, hba->vreg_info.vcc, false);
+ ufshcd_toggle_vreg(hba->dev, hba->vreg_info.vcc, false);
if (!ufshcd_is_link_active(hba)) {
ufshcd_config_vreg_lpm(hba, hba->vreg_info.vccq);
ufshcd_config_vreg_lpm(hba, hba->vreg_info.vccq2);
@@ -8172,6 +8171,7 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
enum ufs_pm_level pm_lvl;
enum ufs_dev_pwr_mode req_dev_pwr_mode;
enum uic_link_state req_link_state;
+ bool keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode = false;
hba->pm_op_in_progress = 1;
if (!ufshcd_is_shutdown_pm(pm_op)) {
@@ -8226,28 +8226,27 @@ static int ufshcd_suspend(struct ufs_hba *hba, enum ufs_pm_op pm_op)
/* make sure that auto bkops is disabled */
ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba);
}
+
Unnecessary newline, perhaps?
/*
- * With wb enabled, if the bkops is enabled or if the
- * configured WB type is 70% full, keep vcc ON
- * for the device to flush the wb buffer
+ * If device needs to do BKOP or WB buffer flush, keep device
+ * power mode as "active power mode" and its VCC supply.
*/
- if ((hba->auto_bkops_enabled && ufshcd_is_wb_allowed(hba)) ||
- ufshcd_wb_keep_vcc_on(hba))
- hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = true;
- else
- hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = false;
- } else {
- hba->dev_info.keep_vcc_on = false;
+ keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode = hba->auto_bkops_enabled ||
+ ufshcd_wb_keep_vcc_on(hba);
Should the device be in UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE to perform auto-bkops?

Also, is it needed to keep the device in UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE , if flush on hibern8 is enabled and the link is being put to hibern8 mode during runtime-suspend? Perhaps that should also be factored in here?
}
- if ((req_dev_pwr_mode != hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) &&
- ((ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op) && !hba->auto_bkops_enabled) ||
- !ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op))) {
- /* ensure that bkops is disabled */
- ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba);
- ret = ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(hba, req_dev_pwr_mode);
- if (ret)
- goto enable_gating;
+ if (req_dev_pwr_mode != hba->curr_dev_pwr_mode) {
+ if ((ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op) && !hba->auto_bkops_enabled) ||
+ !ufshcd_is_runtime_pm(pm_op)) {
+ /* ensure that bkops is disabled */
+ ufshcd_disable_auto_bkops(hba);
+ }
+
+ if (!keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode) {
+ ret = ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode(hba, req_dev_pwr_mode);

Now, when the WB buffer is completely flushed out, the device should be put back into UFS_SLEEP_PWR_MODE or UFS_POWERDOWN_PWR_MODE. Say, the device buffer has to be flushed and during runtime-suspend, the device is put to UFS_ACTIVE_PWR_MODE and Vcc is kept ON; the device doesn't resume nor does the system enters suspend for a very long time, and with AH8 and hibern8 disabled, there will be an unnecessary power drain for that much time.

How about a periodic interval checking of flush status if keep_curr_dev_pwr_mode evaluates to be true?

+ if (ret)
+ goto enable_gating;
+ }
}
flush_work(&hba->eeh_work);




--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project