Re: [PATCH V5 5/5] rpmsg: glink: unregister rpmsg device during endpoint destroy

[Mathieu Poirier]

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:40:06AM +0530, Arun Kumar Neelakantam wrote:
> Rpmsg device unregister is not happening if channel close is triggered
> from local side and causing re-registration of device failures.
> 
> Unregister rpmsg device for local close in endpoint destroy path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar Neelakantam <aneela@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> index 0e8a28c0..fc8ef66 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
> @@ -1207,6 +1207,7 @@ static void qcom_glink_destroy_ept(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept)
>  {
>  	struct glink_channel *channel = to_glink_channel(ept);
>  	struct qcom_glink *glink = channel->glink;
> +	struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&channel->recv_lock, flags);
> @@ -1214,6 +1215,13 @@ static void qcom_glink_destroy_ept(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept)
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&channel->recv_lock, flags);
>  
>  	/* Decouple the potential rpdev from the channel */
> +	if (channel->rpdev) {

If we proceed this way no other channel can have an rpdev.  I would hope that
unregistration of rpdev would be more symetrical to what is done in patch 03.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> +		strncpy(chinfo.name, channel->name, sizeof(chinfo.name));
> +		chinfo.src = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY;
> +		chinfo.dst = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY;
> +
> +		rpmsg_unregister_device(glink->dev, &chinfo);
> +	}
>  	channel->rpdev = NULL;
>  
>  	qcom_glink_send_close_req(glink, channel);
> @@ -1477,6 +1485,7 @@ static void qcom_glink_rx_close(struct qcom_glink *glink, unsigned int rcid)
>  
>  		rpmsg_unregister_device(glink->dev, &chinfo);
>  	}
> +	channel->rpdev = NULL;
>  
>  	qcom_glink_send_close_ack(glink, channel->rcid);
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4