Re: [PATCH v1] driver core: Add state_synced sysfs file for devices that support it

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Thu May 14 2020 - 02:13:56 EST


On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:49:57AM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:34 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:22 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 06:34:15PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> > > > This can be used to check if a device supports sync_state() callbacks
> > > > and therefore keeps resources left on by the bootloader enabled till all
> > > > its consumers have probed.
> > > >
> > > > This can also be used to check if sync_state() has been called for a
> > > > device or whether it is still trying to keep resources enabled because
> > > > they were left enabled by the bootloader and all its consumers haven't
> > > > probed yet.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-state_synced | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
> > > > drivers/base/dd.c | 16 +++++++++++++
> > > > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
> > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-state_synced
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-state_synced b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-state_synced
> > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > index 000000000000..0c922d7d02fc
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-state_synced
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> > > > +What: /sys/devices/.../state_synced
> > > > +Date: May 2020
> > > > +Contact: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > +Description:
> > > > + The /sys/devices/.../state_synced attribute is only present for
> > > > + devices whose bus types or driver provides the .sync_state()
> > > > + callback. The number read from it (0 or 1) reflects the value
> > > > + of the device's 'state_synced' field. A value of 0 means the
> > > > + .sync_state() callback hasn't been called yet. A value of 1
> > > > + means the .sync_state() callback has been called.
> > > > +
> > > > + Generally, if a device has sync_state() support and has some of
> > > > + the resources it provides enabled at the time the kernel starts
> > > > + (Eg: enabled by hardware reset or bootloader or anything that
> > > > + run before the kernel starts), then it'll keep those resources
> > > > + enabled and in a state that's compatible with the state they
> > > > + were in at the start of the kernel. The device will stop doing
> > > > + this only when the sync_state() callback has been called --
> > > > + which happens only when all its consumer devices are registered
> > > > + and have probed successfully. Resources that were left disabled
> > > > + at the time the kernel starts are not affected or limited in
> > > > + any way by sync_state() callbacks.
> > > > +
> > > > +
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/base/dd.c b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > > > index 48ca81cb8ebc..72599436ae84 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/base/dd.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/base/dd.c
> > > > @@ -458,6 +458,13 @@ static void driver_deferred_probe_add_trigger(struct device *dev,
> > > > driver_deferred_probe_trigger();
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static ssize_t state_synced_show(struct device *dev,
> > > > + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", dev->state_synced);
> > > > +}
> > > > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(state_synced);
> > > > +
> > > > static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> > > > {
> > > > int ret = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > > > @@ -531,9 +538,16 @@ static int really_probe(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> > > > goto dev_groups_failed;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > + if (dev_has_sync_state(dev) &&
> > > > + device_create_file(dev, &dev_attr_state_synced)) {
> > > > + dev_err(dev, "state_synced sysfs add failed\n");
> > > > + goto dev_sysfs_state_synced_failed;
> > > > + }
> > >
> > > Why not add this to the groups above this and only enable it if needed
> > > at runtime?
> >
> > Those groups above seem to be driver specific groups. Looking at the
> > code, some drivers seem to be setting them. Also, this attribute can
> > only be decided after a driver has successfully bound to the device
> > because dev_has_sync_state() has to check the bus and the driver for
> > sync_state() support.
> >
> > > The is_visible() callback should be what you need to use here.
> >
> > If this is an attribute specific property, it might work. I'll take a look.
>
> I took a look at is_visible(). It only makes sense for a group of
> attributes that are exposed in a sub directory. But state_synced is a
> top level property IMO. What I'm doing is similar to the "online"
> attribute that's exposed for a device.

No, no need for a subdirectory for an attribute group. If you don't
have a name for the group, the files will be placed in the device's
directory.

> And even if I create a group with one lone attribute, I'll still have
> to add it after the device has probed or have to call
> sysfs_update_groups() after the device is probed to update the
> visibility. Seems quite messy and unnecessarily complicated.

Ah, ok, that is messier.

> I'd like to keep this an attribute and not create a group for that
> reason. Does that sound okay to you? I'll obviously still do the clean
> up correctly.

Ok, that's fine, we can change it later if we figure it out.

thanks,

greg k-h