Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] firmware: smccc: Add basic SMCCC v1.2 + ARCH_SOC_ID support

From: Sudeep Holla
Date: Fri May 15 2020 - 05:18:24 EST


On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 09:50:32AM +0200, Etienne Carriere wrote:
> > From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This patch series adds support for SMCCCv1.2 ARCH_SOC_ID.
> > This doesn't add other changes added in SMCCC v1.2 yet. They will
> > follow these soon along with its first user SPCI/PSA-FF.
> >
> > This is tested using upstream TF-A + the patch[2] fixing the original
> > implementation there.
> >
> >
> > v1[0]->v2[1]:
> > - Incorporated comments from Steven Price in patch 5/5
> > - Fixed build for CONFIG_PSCI_FW=n on some arm32 platforms
> > - Added Steven Price's review tags
> >
> > v2[1]->v3:
> > - Incorporated additional comments from Steven Price in patch 5/5
> > and added his review tags
> > - Refactored SMCCC code from PSCI and moved it under
> > drivers/firmware/smccc/smccc.c
> > - Also moved soc_id.c under drivers/firmware/smccc
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sudeep
>
> Hello Sudeep,
>
> In case it helps. I have successfully tested the 7 patches series
> on some platforms, playing a bit with few configurations.
> Qemu emulator for arm64/cortex-a57 with TF-A (v2.x) as secure firmware.
> Qemu emulator for arm/cortex-a15. OP-TEE (v3.x) as secure firmware.
> A stm32mp15 device (arm/cortex-a7), tested both TF-A (v2.x) and
> OP-TEE (3.7.0, 3.9.0-rc) as runtime secure firmware.
>
> Helper functions arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit()/arm_smccc_1_1_invoke()
> works as expected AFAICT. No regression seen with older secure
> firmwares.
>
> For the patches 1 to 6, as I poorly tested [v3,7/7] soc ids,
> based on tag next-20200505 [1]:
> Tested-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@xxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@xxxxxx>
>
> For [v3,7/7] firmware: smccc: Add ARCH_SOC_ID support
> Acked-by: Etienne Carriere <etienne.carriere@xxxxxx>
>
> [1] 7def1ef0f72c ("Add linux-next specific files for 20200505")
>

Thanks for review and testing Etienne. Much appreciated!

--
Regards,
Sudeep