Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Implement lane reordering + polarity

[Rob Clark]

On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 2:03 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The ti-sn65dsi86 MIPI DSI to eDP bridge chip supports arbitrary
> remapping of eDP lanes and also polarity inversion.  Both of these
> features have been described in the device tree bindings for the
> device since the beginning but were never implemented in the driver.
> Implement both of them.
>
> Part of this change also allows you to (via the same device tree
> bindings) specify to use fewer than the max number of DP lanes that
> the panel reports.  This could be useful if your display supports more
> lanes but only a few are hooked up on your board.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> This patch is based upon my my outstanding series[1] not because there
> is any real requirement but simply to avoid merge conflicts.  I
> believe that my previous series is ready to land.  If, however, you'd
> prefer that I rebase this patch somewhere atop something else then
> please shout.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200430194617.197510-1-dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Use SN_MAX_DP_LANES instead of 4 in one place.
> - Comment that we aren't doing full validation of dts params.
> - Check dp_lanes <= SN_MAX_DP_LANES to avoid buffer overrun.
> - Add missing of_node_put()
>
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 82 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index 1a125423eb07..534b712dccf8 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -50,8 +50,12 @@
>  #define SN_CHA_VERTICAL_BACK_PORCH_REG         0x36
>  #define SN_CHA_HORIZONTAL_FRONT_PORCH_REG      0x38
>  #define SN_CHA_VERTICAL_FRONT_PORCH_REG                0x3A
> +#define SN_LN_ASSIGN_REG                       0x59
> +#define  LN_ASSIGN_WIDTH                       2
>  #define SN_ENH_FRAME_REG                       0x5A
>  #define  VSTREAM_ENABLE                                BIT(3)
> +#define  LN_POLRS_OFFSET                       4
> +#define  LN_POLRS_MASK                         0xf0
>  #define SN_DATA_FORMAT_REG                     0x5B
>  #define  BPP_18_RGB                            BIT(0)
>  #define SN_HPD_DISABLE_REG                     0x5C
> @@ -98,6 +102,7 @@
>
>  #define SN_REGULATOR_SUPPLY_NUM                4
>
> +#define SN_MAX_DP_LANES                        4
>  #define SN_NUM_GPIOS                   4
>
>  /**
> @@ -115,6 +120,8 @@
>   * @enable_gpio:  The GPIO we toggle to enable the bridge.
>   * @supplies:     Data for bulk enabling/disabling our regulators.
>   * @dp_lanes:     Count of dp_lanes we're using.
> + * @ln_assign:    Value to program to the LN_ASSIGN register.
> + * @ln_polr:      Value for the 4-bit LN_POLRS field of SN_ENH_FRAME_REG.
>   *
>   * @gchip:        If we expose our GPIOs, this is used.
>   * @gchip_output: A cache of whether we've set GPIOs to output.  This
> @@ -140,6 +147,8 @@ struct ti_sn_bridge {
>         struct gpio_desc                *enable_gpio;
>         struct regulator_bulk_data      supplies[SN_REGULATOR_SUPPLY_NUM];
>         int                             dp_lanes;
> +       u8                              ln_assign;
> +       u8                              ln_polrs;
>
>         struct gpio_chip                gchip;
>         DECLARE_BITMAP(gchip_output, SN_NUM_GPIOS);
> @@ -707,26 +716,20 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
>         int dp_rate_idx;
>         unsigned int val;
>         int ret = -EINVAL;
> +       int max_dp_lanes;
>
> -       /*
> -        * Run with the maximum number of lanes that the DP sink supports.
> -        *
> -        * Depending use cases, we might want to revisit this later because:
> -        * - It's plausible that someone may have run fewer lines to the
> -        *   sink than the sink actually supports, assuming that the lines
> -        *   will just be driven at a higher rate.
> -        * - The DP spec seems to indicate that it's more important to minimize
> -        *   the number of lanes than the link rate.
> -        *
> -        * If we do revisit, it would be important to measure the power impact.
> -        */
> -       pdata->dp_lanes = ti_sn_get_max_lanes(pdata);
> +       max_dp_lanes = ti_sn_get_max_lanes(pdata);
> +       pdata->dp_lanes = min(pdata->dp_lanes, max_dp_lanes);
>
>         /* DSI_A lane config */
> -       val = CHA_DSI_LANES(4 - pdata->dsi->lanes);
> +       val = CHA_DSI_LANES(SN_MAX_DP_LANES - pdata->dsi->lanes);
>         regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_DSI_LANES_REG,
>                            CHA_DSI_LANES_MASK, val);
>
> +       regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_LN_ASSIGN_REG, pdata->ln_assign);
> +       regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_ENH_FRAME_REG, LN_POLRS_MASK,
> +                          pdata->ln_polrs << LN_POLRS_OFFSET);
> +
>         /* set dsi clk frequency value */
>         ti_sn_bridge_set_dsi_rate(pdata);
>
> @@ -1063,6 +1066,55 @@ static int ti_sn_setup_gpio_controller(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> +static void ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata,
> +                                    struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +       u32 lane_assignments[SN_MAX_DP_LANES] = { 0, 1, 2, 3 };
> +       u32 lane_polarities[SN_MAX_DP_LANES] = { };
> +       struct device_node *endpoint;
> +       u8 ln_assign = 0;
> +       u8 ln_polrs = 0;
> +       int dp_lanes;
> +       int i;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Read config from the device tree about lane remapping and lane
> +        * polarities.  These are optional and we assume identity map and
> +        * normal polarity if nothing is specified.  It's OK to specify just
> +        * data-lanes but not lane-polarities but not vice versa.
> +        *
> +        * Error checking is light (we just make sure we don't crash or
> +        * buffer overrun) and we assume dts is well formed and specifying
> +        * mappings that the hardware supports.
> +        */
> +       endpoint = of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(np, 1, -1);
> +       dp_lanes = of_property_count_u32_elems(endpoint, "data-lanes");
> +       if (dp_lanes > 0 && dp_lanes <= SN_MAX_DP_LANES) {
> +               of_property_read_u32_array(endpoint, "data-lanes",
> +                                          lane_assignments, dp_lanes);
> +               of_property_read_u32_array(endpoint, "lane-polarities",
> +                                          lane_polarities, dp_lanes);
> +       } else {
> +               dp_lanes = SN_MAX_DP_LANES;
> +       }
> +       of_node_put(endpoint);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Convert into register format.  Loop over all lanes even if
> +        * data-lanes had fewer elements so that we nicely initialize
> +        * the LN_ASSIGN register.
> +        */
> +       for (i = SN_MAX_DP_LANES - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> +               ln_assign = ln_assign << LN_ASSIGN_WIDTH | lane_assignments[i];
> +               ln_polrs = ln_polrs << 1 | lane_polarities[i];
> +       }
> +
> +       /* Stash in our struct for when we power on */
> +       pdata->dp_lanes = dp_lanes;
> +       pdata->ln_assign = ln_assign;
> +       pdata->ln_polrs = ln_polrs;
> +}
> +
>  static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>                               const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>  {
> @@ -1105,6 +1157,8 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>                 return ret;
>         }
>
> +       ti_sn_bridge_parse_lanes(pdata, client->dev.of_node);
> +
>         ret = ti_sn_bridge_parse_regulators(pdata);
>         if (ret) {
>                 DRM_ERROR("failed to parse regulators\n");
> --
> 2.26.2.645.ge9eca65c58-goog
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel