Re: [PATCH] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Fix off-by-one error in clock choice
From: Rob Clark
Date: Fri May 15 2020 - 17:49:35 EST
On Mon, May 4, 2020 at 9:32 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> If the rate in our table is _equal_ to the rate we want then it's OK
> to pick it. It doesn't need to be greater than the one we want.
>
> Fixes: a095f15c00e2 ("drm/bridge: add support for sn65dsi86 bridge driver")
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> index 6ad688b320ae..be000b0ca56b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> @@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_calc_min_dp_rate_idx(struct ti_sn_bridge *pdata)
> 1000 * pdata->dp_lanes * DP_CLK_FUDGE_DEN);
>
> for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut) - 1; i++)
> - if (ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[i] > dp_rate_mhz)
> + if (ti_sn_bridge_dp_rate_lut[i] >= dp_rate_mhz)
> break;
>
> return i;
> --
> 2.26.2.526.g744177e7f7-goog
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel