Re: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] Documentation/litmus-tests: Merge atomic's README into top-level one

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 08:05:30AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 12:01:41AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 May 2020 15:45:58 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 07:03:33AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 14 May 2020 10:16:56 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >>> On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 08:46:18AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > >>>> On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 06:39:03AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> > >>>>> From 96fa6680e3b990633ecbb6d11acf03a161b790bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > >>>>> From: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>> Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 15:12:57 +0900
> > >>>>> Subject: [PATCH RESEND 3/4] Documentation/litmus-tests: Merge atomic's README into top-level one
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Where Documentation/litmus-tests/README lists RCU litmus tests,
> > >>>>> Documentation/litmus-tests/atomic/README lists atomic litmus tests.
> > >>>>> For symmetry, merge the latter into former, with some context
> > >>>>> adjustment in the introduction.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Signed-off-by: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>> Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>> Acked-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Acked-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks!
> > >>>
> > >>> Applied, and thank you all!
> > >>>
> > >>> I rebased, cancelling the revert with the original, resulting in an
> > >>> updated lkmm branch on -rcu.  There was one minor conflict, so could
> > >>> one of you please check to make sure that I resolved things appropriately?
> > >>
> > >> One thing I noticed.
> > >>
> > >> Commit b2998782ded4 ("Documentation/litmus-tests: Clarify about the RCU
> > >> pre-initialization test")'s change log says:
> > >>
> > >>     Since this test returned to tools/memory-model/, make sure that it is
> > >>                     ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >>     at least referenced from Documentation/litmus-tests/'s README.
> > >>
> > >> Because of the rebase, this needs amendment as well as the title.
> > >>
> > >> Something like
> > >>
> > >>     Documentation/litumus-tests: Cite a relevant litmus test in tools/memory-model
> > >>
> > >>     For ease of finding the RCU related litmus test under
> > >>     tools/memory-model/, add an entry in README.
> > >>
> > >> ?
> > > 
> > > Good catch, and yes, I will update that on the next rebase.
> > > 
> > > Any other things in need of adjustment?
> > 
> > Aside from the missing Signed-off-by tags Stephen pointed out, I don't
> > see anything.
> 
> Yeah, I did mess that up!  ;-)
> 
> Thank you for checking!!!

And I have fixed these during the merge with Thomas's and Peter's series
(or at least the noinstr-rcu-nmi-2020-05-15 portion of it), again,
thank you!

							Thanx, Paul