Re: [PATCH v12 00/18] Enable FSGSBASE instructions

[Sasha Levin]

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 11:51:07AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:24:14PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > Can you put me to the CC-loop for this patches. Some SGX-enabled
> > > frameworks such as Graphene use out-of-tree changes to achieve this.
> > > That's where the interest to possibly test this comes from.
> >
> > Indeed, we've seen a few hacks that basically just enable FSGSBASE:
> >
> >  - https://github.com/oscarlab/graphene-sgx-driver
> >  - https://github.com/occlum/enable_rdfsbase
>
> I'm really amazed by all these security experts enabling a full root
> hole. It clearly puts the SGX hypocrisy into perspective.

We can bash Intel all we want here, but sadly there are users in the
"wild" who just enable these root holes thinking they're secure, and
those users are the ones running very sensitive workloads. Here's an
example from a book called "Responsible Genomic Data Sharing":

	https://books.google.com/books?id=y6zWDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA184#v=onepage&q&f=false

That explains how to use Graphene-SGX which just enables FSGSBASE with
root holes.

Maybe it's just me, but I'd love to have my genomic data stored and
processed on systems that are actually secure :)

--
Thanks,
Sasha