Re: [PATCH v2 12/15] ath10k: use new module_firmware_crashed()

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Mon, 18 May 2020 21:22:02 +0000 Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> Indeed my issue with devlink is that it did not seem generic enough for
> all devices which use firmware and for which firmware can crash. Support
> should not have to be "add devlink support" + "now use this new hook",
> but rather a very lighweight devlink_crash(device) call we can sprinkly
> with only the device as a functional requirement.

We can provide a lightweight devlink_crash(device) which only generates
the notification, without the need to register the health reporter or a
devlink instance upfront. But then we loose the ability to control the
recovery, count errors, etc. So I'd think that's not the direction we
want to go in.