Re: [PATCH 10/10] mm/migrate.c: call detach_page_private to cleanup code

From: Guoqing Jiang
Date: Tue May 19 2020 - 16:44:46 EST


Hi Andrew,

On 5/19/20 9:35 AM, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
On 5/19/20 7:12 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 17 May 2020 23:47:18 +0200 Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

We can cleanup code a little by call detach_page_private here.

...

--- a/mm/migrate.c
+++ b/mm/migrate.c
@@ -804,10 +804,7 @@ static int __buffer_migrate_page(struct address_space *mapping,
ÂÂÂÂÂ if (rc != MIGRATEPAGE_SUCCESS)
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ goto unlock_buffers;
 - ClearPagePrivate(page);
-ÂÂÂ set_page_private(newpage, page_private(page));
-ÂÂÂ set_page_private(page, 0);
-ÂÂÂ put_page(page);
+ÂÂÂ set_page_private(newpage, detach_page_private(page));
ÂÂÂÂÂ get_page(newpage);
 Â bh = head;
mm/migrate.c: In function '__buffer_migrate_page':
./include/linux/mm_types.h:243:52: warning: assignment makes integer from pointer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
 #define set_page_private(page, v) ((page)->private = (v))
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ^
mm/migrate.c:800:2: note: in expansion of macro 'set_page_private'
ÂÂ set_page_private(newpage, detach_page_private(page));
ÂÂ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The fact that set_page_private(detach_page_private()) generates a type
mismatch warning seems deeply wrong, surely.

Please let's get the types sorted out - either unsigned long or void *,
not half-one and half-the other. Whatever needs the least typecasting
at callsites, I suggest.

Sorry about that, I should notice the warning before. I will double check if other
places need the typecast or not, then send a new version.

Only this patch missed the typecast. I guess I just need to send an updated patch
to replace this one (I am fine to send a new patch set if you want), sorry again for
the trouble.


And can we please implement set_page_private() and page_private() with
inlined C code? There is no need for these to be macros.

Just did a quick change.

-#define page_private(page)ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ((page)->private)
-#define set_page_private(page, v)ÂÂÂÂÂ ((page)->private = (v))
+static inline unsigned long page_private(struct page *page)
+{
+ÂÂÂÂÂÂ return page->private;
+}
+
+static inline void set_page_private(struct page *page, unsigned long priv_data)
+{
+ÂÂÂÂÂÂ page->private = priv_data;
+}

Then I get error like.

fs/erofs/zdata.h: In function âz_erofs_onlinepage_indexâ:
fs/erofs/zdata.h:126:8: error: lvalue required as unary â&â operand
 u.v = &page_private(page);
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ^

I guess it is better to keep page_private as macro, please correct me in case I
missed something.

Lost of problems need to be fixed if change page_private to inline function, so I
think it is better to keep it and only convert set_page_private.

mm/compaction.c: In function âisolate_migratepages_blockâ:
./include/linux/compiler.h:287:20: error: lvalue required as unary â&â operand
ÂÂ __read_once_size(&(x), __u.__c, sizeof(x));Â \
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ^
./include/linux/compiler.h:293:22: note: in expansion of macro â__READ_ONCEâ
Â#define READ_ONCE(x) __READ_ONCE(x, 1)
ÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂÂ ^~~~~~~~~~~
mm/internal.h:293:34: note: in expansion of macro âREAD_ONCEâ
Â#define page_order_unsafe(page)Â READ_ONCE(page_private(page))


Thanks,
Guoqing