Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for TTBR1

[Jordan Crouse]

On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 03:59:59PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 05:33:47PM -0600, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > Add support to enable TTBR1 if the domain requests it via the
> > DOMAIN_ATTR_SPLIT_TABLES attribute. If enabled by the hardware
> > and pagetable configuration the driver will configure the TTBR1 region
> > and program the domain pagetable on TTBR1. TTBR0 will be disabled.
> > 
> > After attaching the device the value of he domain attribute can
> > be queried to see if the split pagetables were successfully programmed.
> > The domain geometry will be updated as well so that the caller can
> > determine the active region for the pagetable that was programmed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse <jcrouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> >  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> >  drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h | 24 +++++++++++++++-----
> >  2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > index a6a5796e9c41..db6d503c1673 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > @@ -555,11 +555,16 @@ static void arm_smmu_init_context_bank(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
> >  			cb->ttbr[0] = pgtbl_cfg->arm_v7s_cfg.ttbr;
> >  			cb->ttbr[1] = 0;
> >  		} else {
> > -			cb->ttbr[0] = pgtbl_cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.ttbr;
> > -			cb->ttbr[0] |= FIELD_PREP(ARM_SMMU_TTBRn_ASID,
> > -						  cfg->asid);
> > -			cb->ttbr[1] = FIELD_PREP(ARM_SMMU_TTBRn_ASID,
> > -						 cfg->asid);
> > +			cb->ttbr[0] = FIELD_PREP(ARM_SMMU_TTBRn_ASID,
> > +				cfg->asid);
> > +
> > +			if (pgtbl_cfg->quirks & IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_TTBR1) {
> > +				cb->ttbr[1] = pgtbl_cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.ttbr;
> > +			} else {
> > +				cb->ttbr[0] |= pgtbl_cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.ttbr;
> > +				cb->ttbr[1] = FIELD_PREP(ARM_SMMU_TTBRn_ASID,
> > +							 cfg->asid);
> > +			}
> 
> This looks odd to me. As I mentioned before, the SMMU driver absolutely has
> to manage the ASID space, so we should be setting it in both TTBRs here.

Somebody had suggested a while back to only do TTBR0 but I agree that it makes
more sense for it to be on both.

> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> > index 8d1cd54d82a6..5f6d0af7c8c8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.h
> > @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ enum arm_smmu_cbar_type {
> >  #define ARM_SMMU_TCR_SH0		GENMASK(13, 12)
> >  #define ARM_SMMU_TCR_ORGN0		GENMASK(11, 10)
> >  #define ARM_SMMU_TCR_IRGN0		GENMASK(9, 8)
> > +#define ARM_SMMU_TCR_EPD0		BIT(7)
> >  #define ARM_SMMU_TCR_T0SZ		GENMASK(5, 0)
> >  
> >  #define ARM_SMMU_VTCR_RES1		BIT(31)
> > @@ -343,16 +344,27 @@ struct arm_smmu_domain {
> >  	struct mutex			init_mutex; /* Protects smmu pointer */
> >  	spinlock_t			cb_lock; /* Serialises ATS1* ops and TLB syncs */
> >  	struct iommu_domain		domain;
> > +	bool				split_pagetables;
> >  };
> >  
> >  static inline u32 arm_smmu_lpae_tcr(struct io_pgtable_cfg *cfg)
> >  {
> > -	return ARM_SMMU_TCR_EPD1 |
> > -	       FIELD_PREP(ARM_SMMU_TCR_TG0, cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.tcr.tg) |
> > -	       FIELD_PREP(ARM_SMMU_TCR_SH0, cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.tcr.sh) |
> > -	       FIELD_PREP(ARM_SMMU_TCR_ORGN0, cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.tcr.orgn) |
> > -	       FIELD_PREP(ARM_SMMU_TCR_IRGN0, cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.tcr.irgn) |
> > -	       FIELD_PREP(ARM_SMMU_TCR_T0SZ, cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.tcr.tsz);
> > +	u32 tcr = FIELD_PREP(ARM_SMMU_TCR_TG0, cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.tcr.tg) |
> > +		FIELD_PREP(ARM_SMMU_TCR_SH0, cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.tcr.sh) |
> > +		FIELD_PREP(ARM_SMMU_TCR_ORGN0, cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.tcr.orgn) |
> > +		FIELD_PREP(ARM_SMMU_TCR_IRGN0, cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.tcr.irgn) |
> > +		FIELD_PREP(ARM_SMMU_TCR_T0SZ, cfg->arm_lpae_s1_cfg.tcr.tsz);
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +	* When TTBR1 is selected shift the TCR fields by 16 bits and disable
> > +	* translation in TTBR0
> > +	*/
> > +	if (cfg->quirks & IO_PGTABLE_QUIRK_ARM_TTBR1)
> > +		tcr = (tcr << 16) | ARM_SMMU_TCR_EPD0;
> 
> This looks reasonably dodgy to me, as you copy a RESERVED bit into the A1
> field. Furthermore, for 32-bit context banks you've got the EAE bit to
> contend with as well.

I can swizzle it more if we need to. I think Robin's main objection was that we
didn't want to construct the whole half of the TCR twice and have a bunch of
field definitions for the T1 space that are only used in this special case. 

> Perhaps we shouldn't expose DOMAIN_ATTR_SPLIT_TABLES for anything other than
> the 64-bit page table format.

We kind of enforce that in arm_smmu_init_domain_context [1] by only allowing the
quirk to be set when cfg->fmt == ARM_SMMU_CTX_FMT_AARCH64 and stage 1. I'm not
sure if that is formal enough or if we should bake something in to
io-pgtable-arm to warn against it too.

Jordan

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project