Re: Bad kfree of dma_parms in v5.7-rc5
From: Marek Szyprowski
Date: Wed May 20 2020 - 05:13:27 EST
Hi Tomi,
On 20.05.2020 11:00, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Commit 9495b7e92f716ab2bd6814fab5e97ab4a39adfdd ("driver core:
> platform: Initialize dma_parms for platform devices") v5.7-rc5 causes
> at least some v4l2 platform drivers to break when freeing resources.
>
> E.g. drivers/media/platform/ti-vpe/cal.c uses
> vb2_dma_contig_set_max_seg_size() and
> vb2_dma_contig_clear_max_seg_size() to manage the dma_params, and
> similar pattern is seen in other drivers too.
>
> After 9495b7e92f716ab2, vb2_dma_contig_set_max_seg_size() will not
> allocate anything, but vb2_dma_contig_clear_max_seg_size() will still
> kfree the dma_params.
>
> I'm not sure what's the proper fix here. A flag somewhere to indicate
> that vb2_dma_contig_set_max_seg_size() did allocate, and thus
> vb2_dma_contig_clear_max_seg_size() must free?
>
> Or drop the kzalloc and kfree totally, if dma_params is now supposed
> to always be there?
Thanks for reporting this issue!
Once the mentioned commit has been merged, the code should assume that
the platform devices does have a struct dma_params allocated, so the
proper fix is to alloc dma_params only if the bus is not a platform bus:
if (!dev_is_platform(dev) && !dev->dma_parms) {
ÂÂÂ dev->dma_parms = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev->dma_parms), GFP_KERNEL);
same check for the free path.
Would you like to send a patch for that?
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland