On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:40:06AM +0530, Arun Kumar Neelakantam wrote:Unregister here also required along with in qcom_glink_rx_close() otherwise if the remote open the channel again it map to stale rpmsg device.
Rpmsg device unregister is not happening if channel close is triggeredIf we proceed this way no other channel can have an rpdev. I would hope that
from local side and causing re-registration of device failures.
Unregister rpmsg device for local close in endpoint destroy path.
Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar Neelakantam <aneela@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
index 0e8a28c0..fc8ef66 100644
--- a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
@@ -1207,6 +1207,7 @@ static void qcom_glink_destroy_ept(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept)
{
struct glink_channel *channel = to_glink_channel(ept);
struct qcom_glink *glink = channel->glink;
+ struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo;
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&channel->recv_lock, flags);
@@ -1214,6 +1215,13 @@ static void qcom_glink_destroy_ept(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&channel->recv_lock, flags);
/* Decouple the potential rpdev from the channel */
+ if (channel->rpdev) {
unregistration of rpdev would be more symetrical to what is done in patch 03.
Thanks,
Mathieu
+ strncpy(chinfo.name, channel->name, sizeof(chinfo.name));
+ chinfo.src = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY;
+ chinfo.dst = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY;
+
+ rpmsg_unregister_device(glink->dev, &chinfo);
+ }
channel->rpdev = NULL;
qcom_glink_send_close_req(glink, channel);
@@ -1477,6 +1485,7 @@ static void qcom_glink_rx_close(struct qcom_glink *glink, unsigned int rcid)
rpmsg_unregister_device(glink->dev, &chinfo);
}
+ channel->rpdev = NULL;
qcom_glink_send_close_ack(glink, channel->rcid);
--
2.7.4