Re: [PATCH 20/33] ipv4: add ip_sock_set_recverr

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 04:51:26AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Mostly to keep it symmetric with the sockopt.  I could probably remove
> > a few arguments in the series if we want to be strict.
> 
> My preference would use strict and add
> arguments only when necessary.

In a few cases that would create confusion as the arguments are rather
overloaded.  But for a lot of the cases where it doesn't and there isn't
really much use for other arguments I've done that now.