Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: unify reclaim retry limits with page allocator

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Wed May 20 2020 - 19:42:45 EST

Next message: Kees Cook: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] exec: Control flow simplifications"
Previous message: kbuild test robot: "[tip:x86/entry 23/80] arch/x86/entry/common.c:44:24: warning: no previous prototype for function 'enter_from_user_mode'"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: unify reclaim retry limits with page allocator"
Next in thread: Chris Down: "Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: unify reclaim retry limits with page allocator"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, 20 May 2020 16:40:37 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > -/* The number of times we should retry reclaim failures before giving up. */
>
> hm, what tree is this against?

Ah, my habit of working in reverse time order sometimes does this ;)

I suggest that "mm, memcg: reclaim more aggressively before high
allocator throttling" and this patch become a two-patch series?

Next message: Kees Cook: "Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] exec: Control flow simplifications"
Previous message: kbuild test robot: "[tip:x86/entry 23/80] arch/x86/entry/common.c:44:24: warning: no previous prototype for function 'enter_from_user_mode'"
In reply to: Andrew Morton: "Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: unify reclaim retry limits with page allocator"
Next in thread: Chris Down: "Re: [PATCH] mm, memcg: unify reclaim retry limits with page allocator"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]