Re: [PATCH v3 08/14] mips: MAAR: Use more precise address mask

[Thomas Bogendoerfer]

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 03:34:37AM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Indeed according to the MIPS32 Privileged Resource Architecgture the MAAR
> pair register address field either takes [12:31] bits for non-XPA systems
> and [12:55] otherwise. In any case the current address mask is just
> wrong for 64-bit and 32-bits XPA chips. So lets extend it to 59-bits
> of physical address value. This shall cover the 64-bits architecture and
> systems with XPA enabled, and won't cause any problem for non-XPA 32-bit
> systems, since address values exceeding the architecture specific MAAR
> mask will be just truncated with setting zeros in the unsupported upper
> bits.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Paul Burton <paulburton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> ---
> 
> Changelog v3:
> - In accordance with MIPS32/64 Privileged Resource Architecture Extend
>   the MAAR Addr mask to value [12:55] instead of P5600-specific [12:35].
> ---
>  arch/mips/include/asm/mipsregs.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]