Quoting John Hubbard (2020-05-19 01:21:20)
This needs to go through Andrew's -mm tree, due to adding a new gup.c
routine. However, I would really love to have some testing from the
drm/i915 folks, because I haven't been able to run-time test that part
of it.
CI hit
<4> [185.667750] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1387 at mm/gup.c:2699 internal_get_user_pages_fast+0x63a/0xac0
<4> [185.667752] Modules linked in: vgem snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic i915 mei_hdcp x86_pkg_temp_thermal coretemp snd_hda_intel snd_intel_dspcfg crct10dif_pclmul snd_hda_codec crc32_pclmul snd_hwdep snd_hda_core ghash_clmulni_intel cdc_ether usbnet mii snd_pcm e1000e mei_me ptp pps_core mei intel_lpss_pci prime_numbers
<4> [185.667774] CPU: 0 PID: 1387 Comm: gem_userptr_bli Tainted: G U 5.7.0-rc5-CI-Patchwork_17704+ #1
<4> [185.667777] Hardware name: Intel Corporation Ice Lake Client Platform/IceLake U DDR4 SODIMM PD RVP, BIOS ICLSFWR1.R00.3234.A01.1906141750 06/14/2019
<4> [185.667782] RIP: 0010:internal_get_user_pages_fast+0x63a/0xac0
<4> [185.667785] Code: 24 40 08 48 39 5c 24 38 49 89 df 0f 85 74 fc ff ff 48 83 44 24 50 08 48 39 5c 24 58 49 89 dc 0f 85 e0 fb ff ff e9 14 fe ff ff <0f> 0b b8 ea ff ff ff e9 36 fb ff ff 4c 89 e8 48 21 e8 48 39 e8 0f
<4> [185.667789] RSP: 0018:ffffc90001133c38 EFLAGS: 00010206
<4> [185.667792] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff8884999ee800
<4> [185.667795] RDX: 00000000000c0001 RSI: 0000000000000100 RDI: 00007f419e774000
<4> [185.667798] RBP: ffff888453dbf040 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
<4> [185.667800] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff888453dbf380
<4> [185.667803] R13: ffff8884999ee800 R14: ffff888453dbf3e8 R15: 0000000000000040
<4> [185.667806] FS: 00007f419e875e40(0000) GS:ffff88849fe00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
<4> [185.667808] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
<4> [185.667811] CR2: 00007f419e873000 CR3: 0000000458bd2004 CR4: 0000000000760ef0
<4> [185.667814] PKRU: 55555554
<4> [185.667816] Call Trace:
<4> [185.667912] ? i915_gem_userptr_get_pages+0x1c6/0x290 [i915]
<4> [185.667918] ? mark_held_locks+0x49/0x70
<4> [185.667998] ? i915_gem_userptr_get_pages+0x1c6/0x290 [i915]
<4> [185.668073] ? i915_gem_userptr_get_pages+0x1c6/0x290 [i915]
and then panicked, across a range of systems.
-Chris