Re: [PATCH v12 2/3] i2c: npcm7xx: Add Nuvoton NPCM I2C controller driver

[Tali Perry]

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 11:37 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> > > > I wondered also about DEBUG_FS entries. I can see their value when
> > > > developing the driver. But since this is done now, do they really help a
> > > > user to debug a difficult case? I am not sure, and then I wonder if we
> > > > should have that code in upstream. I am open for discussion, though.
> > >
> > > The user wanted to have health monitor implemented on top of the driver.
> > > The user has 16 channels connected the multiple devices. All are operated
> > > using various daemons in the system. Sometimes the slave devices are power down.
> > > Therefor the user wanted to track the health status of the devices.
> >
> > Ah, then there are these options I have in mind (Wolfram, FYI as well!):
> > 1) push with debugfs as a temporary solution and convert to devlink health protocol [1];
> > 2) drop it and develop devlink_health solution;
> > 3) push debugfs and wait if IÂC will gain devlink health support
>
> No need for 2). We can push it now and convert it later. That being
> said, I wonder if [1] is suitable for this driver? Things like NACKs and
> timeouts happen regularly on an I2C bus and are not a state of bad
> health.
>

Agree, having a timeout every now and then is not an issue. The user
is interested
in cases when the number of timeouts\BER\nack\recovery are high.