Re: [PATCH 3.16 00/99] 3.16.84-rc1 review

[Ben Hutchings]

On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 15:37 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 5/21/20 1:20 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-05-20 at 14:23 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 5/20/20 7:13 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.16.84 release.
> > > > There are 99 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Fri May 22 20:00:00 UTC 2020.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > Build results:
> > > 	total: 135 pass: 135 fail: 0
> > > Qemu test results:
> > > 	total: 230 pass: 227 fail: 3
> > > Failed tests:
> > > 	arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:initrd
> > > 	arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:usb:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:rootfs
> > > 	arm:cubieboard:multi_v7_defconfig:sata:mem512:sun4i-a10-cubieboard:rootfs
> > > 
> > > The arm tests fail due to a compile error.
> > > 
> > > drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra-periph.c:524:65: error: 'CLK_IS_CRITICAL' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'CLK_IS_BASIC'?
> > 
> > I already looked at your first test results and dropped the patch that
> > uses CLK_IS_CRITICAL, so there's something else going wrong there...
> > 
> 
> Ah yes. Sorry, I didn't notice that there was a rebuild.
> 
> Images are fine; the three failing tests should not have been
> tested in the first place (they never did, but I didn't update
> the blacklist when I increased the qemu memory size to 512MB).

OK, thanks for checking.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Logic doesn't apply to the real world. - Marvin Minsky

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part