Re: [PATCH 2/8] KVM: x86: extend struct kvm_vcpu_pv_apf_data with token info

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 21/05/20 16:59, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> However, interrupts for 'page ready' do have a bunch of advantages (more
>> control on what can be preempted by the notification, a saner check for
>> new page faults which is effectively a bug fix) so it makes sense to get
>> them in more quickly (probably 5.9 at this point due to the massive
>> cleanups that are being done around interrupt vectors).
>>
> Actually, I have almost no feedback to address in v2 :-) Almost all
> discussion are happening around #VE. Don't mean to rush or anything but
> if the 'cleanups' are finalized I can hopefully rebase and retest very
> quickly as it's only the KVM guest part which intersects with them, the
> rest should be KVM-only. But 5.9 is good too)

Yeah, going for 5.9 would only be due to the conflicts.  Do send v2
anyway now, so that we can use a merge commit to convert the interrupt
vector to the 5.8 style.

Paolo