Re: [patch V9 00/39] x86/entry: Rework leftovers (was part V)

[Thomas Gleixner]

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> On 5/21/20 4:05 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>>
>>> The full series is available from:
>>>
>>>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/devel.git entry-v9-the-rest
>>
>>
>> Did you mean noinstr-v9-the-rest? I don't see entry-v9-the-rest tag.
>
> Bah. Yes.
>
>> (Also, this series as posted probably won't build. At least based on
>> definition of get_and_clear_inhcall() in patch 13)
>
> Darn. I'm very sure that I built this and then did some final cleanups.

Just figured out why i did not notice: The final test had preemption
enabled ...

Fixed and pushed and the tag is now correct

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/devel.git entry-v9-the-rest

/me goes and rumages in the brown paperbag supply stash.

Thanks,

        tglx