Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree

[Paul E. McKenney]

On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 11:54:26AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 05:12:23PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >> Marco, Thomas, is there any better setup I can provide Stephen?  Or
> >> is the next-20200519 -rcu tree the best we have right now?
> >
> > I've queued the fixes yesterday into tip:locking/kcsan and tglx said
> > something about you having to rebase anyway. I guess you can find him on
> > IRC at some point later. :)
> 
> locking/kcsan is not the problem (it just has more fixes on top)
> 
> core/rcu is the one which diverged and caused the merge conflict with
> PPC to happen twice. So Paul needs to remove the stale core/rcu bits and
> rebase on the current version (which is not going to change again).

So there will be another noinstr-rcu-* tag, and I will rebase on top
of that, correct?  If so, fair enough!

							Thanx, Paul