Re: [PATCH] Removing ununsed variable int lo, hi, int data and int i from comedi/drivers/dt2814.c.
From: GAURAV PATHAK
Date: Sun May 24 2020 - 09:32:56 EST
Nevermind, my sparse version was broken. Installed sparse 0.6.1, but
still no warnings from sparse in any of the directories in drivers staging.
E.g.:
make C=2 M=drivers/staging/sm750fb
CHECK drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c
CHECK drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750_hw.c
CHECK drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750_accel.c
CHECK drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750_cursor.c
CHECK drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_chip.c
CHECK drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_power.c
CHECK drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_mode.c
CHECK drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_display.c
CHECK drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_swi2c.c
CHECK drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_sii164.c
CHECK drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_dvi.c
CHECK drivers/staging/sm750fb/ddk750_hwi2c.c
MODPOST 1 modules
For few drivers, I am getting:
CC [M] drivers/staging/vt6656/key.o
CHECK drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7/include/stddef.h:417:9: warning: preprocessor token offsetof redefined
./include/linux/stddef.h:17:9: this was the original definition
but I guess these are false positive, as #undef offsetof is already present in ./include/linux/stddef.h.
On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 02:10:44PM +0200, Luc Van Oostenryck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 05:06:18PM +0530, Gaurav Pathak wrote:
> > Silence following sparse warning:
> > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/dt2814.c: In function âdt2814_interruptâ:
> > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/dt2814.c:193:6: warning: variable âdataâ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> > int data;
> > ^~~~
> > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/dt2814.c: In function âdt2814_attachâ:
> > drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/dt2814.c:232:6: warning: variable âiâ set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> > int i;
> > ^
>
> These warnings are not from sparse but simply from the compiler.
>
> > static irqreturn_t dt2814_interrupt(int irq, void *d)
> > {
> > - int lo, hi;
> > struct comedi_device *dev = d;
> > struct dt2814_private *devpriv = dev->private;
> > struct comedi_subdevice *s = dev->read_subdev;
> > - int data;
> >
> > if (!dev->attached) {
> > dev_err(dev->class_dev, "spurious interrupt\n");
> > return IRQ_HANDLED;
> > }
> >
> > - hi = inb(dev->iobase + DT2814_DATA);
> > - lo = inb(dev->iobase + DT2814_DATA);
> > -
> > - data = (hi << 4) | (lo >> 4);
>
> OK, 'data' is unused but are these 2 'inb(dev->iobase + DT2814_DATA)'
> needed or not? I would guess that they're needed but I don't know
> this hardware.
>
> > @@ -241,8 +233,6 @@ static int dt2814_attach(struct comedi_device *dev, struct comedi_devconfig *it)
> > dev_err(dev->class_dev, "reset error (fatal)\n");
> > return -EIO;
> > }
> > - i = inb(dev->iobase + DT2814_DATA);
> > - i = inb(dev->iobase + DT2814_DATA);
>
> Same here.
>
> -- Luc