Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip tree

[Singh, Balbir]

On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 21:04 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   83ce56f712af ("x86/mm: Refactor cond_ibpb() to support other use cases")
> 
> from the tip tree and commit:
> 
>   36c8e34d03a1 ("x86/mm: remove vmalloc faulting")
> 
> from the akpm-current tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 

The changes look reasonable to me (in terms of the merge resolution).

Acked-by: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@xxxxxxxxx>