Re: [PATCH 01/10] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: remove unused/incorrect PLL_CAL_VAL

[Stephen Boyd]

Quoting Jonathan Marek (2020-05-26 16:30:38)
> On 5/26/20 7:21 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Jonathan Marek (2020-05-24 14:06:02)
> >> 0x44 isn't a register offset, it is the value that goes into CAL_L_VAL.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@xxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> > 
> > Any fixes tag?
> > 
> 
> This doesn't fix anything (its unused as the commit message says), does 
> that still qualify for a fixes tag?

Sure. Even if it's unused it could be used by someone who backported the
patch somewhere.