Re: [PATCH] MIPS: Fix IRQ tracing when call handle_fpe()

[yuanjunqing]

yes, I will re-send email for this patch.

å 2020/5/26 äå9:04, Thomas Bogendoerfer åé:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 03:07:16PM +0800, yuanjunqing wrote:
>> å 2020/5/25 äå4:42, Thomas Bogendoerfer åé:
>>> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 11:31:23AM +0800, YuanJunQing wrote:
>>>>  Register "a1" is unsaved in this function,
>>>>  when CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS is enabled,
>>>>  the TRACE_IRQS_OFF macro will call trace_hardirqs_off(),
>>>>  and this may change register "a1".
>>>>  The variment of register "a1" may send SIGFPE signal
>>>>  to task when call do_fpe(),and this may kill the task.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: YuanJunQing <yuanjunqing66@xxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>>  arch/mips/kernel/genex.S | 6 ++++--
>>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/genex.S b/arch/mips/kernel/genex.S
>>>> index 8236fb291e3f..956a76429773 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/genex.S
>>>> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/genex.S
>>>> @@ -480,16 +480,18 @@ NESTED(nmi_handler, PT_SIZE, sp)
>>>>  	/* gas fails to assemble cfc1 for some archs (octeon).*/ \
>>>>  	.set	mips1
>>>>  	SET_HARDFLOAT
>>>> -	cfc1	a1, fcr31
>>>> +	cfc1	s0, fcr31
>>>>  	.set	pop
>>>>  	CLI
>>>>  	TRACE_IRQS_OFF
>>>> +	move    a1,s0
>>>>  	.endm
>>> do we realy need to read fcr31 that early ? Wouldn't it work to
>>> just move the cfc1 below TRACE_IRQS_OFF ?
>>>
>>  yes, it can work when we just move the cfc1 below TRACE_IRQS_OFF,
>> Âand the code is written as follows.
>>
>>  	CLI
>>  	TRACE_IRQS_OFF
>>  	.set	mips1
>>  	SET_HARDFLOAT
>> 	cfc1	a1, fcr31
>>  	.set	pop
>> Â      .endm
> good, could we do the same with _cfcmsa	a1, MSA_CSR in the msa case ?
>
> Thomas.
>