Re: [PATCH v3 03/12] dt-bindings: i2c: Discard i2c-slave flag from the DW I2C example

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 1:00 AM Serge Semin
<Sergey.Semin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> dtc currently doesn't support I2C_OWN_SLAVE_ADDRESS flag set in the
> i2c "reg" property. If it is the compiler will print a warning:

Shouldn't be dtc whatever tools fixed?

> Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@1120000/eeprom@64: I2C bus unit address format error, expected "40000064"
> Warning (i2c_bus_reg): /example-2/i2c@1120000/eeprom@64:reg: I2C address must be less than 10-bits, got "0x40000064"
>
> In order to silence dtc up let's discard the flag from the DW I2C DT
> binding example for now. Just revert this commit when dtc is fixed.

Doesn't sound like a good idea. If user happens in between of these
ping-pong change, how they will know this subtle issue?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko