Re: [PATCH v4 06/11] i2c: designware: Add Baytrail sem config DW I2C platform dependency

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 07:00:56PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 06:46:32PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 05:24:06PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:42:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 03:01:06PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> > > > > Currently Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore is a feature of the DW APB I2C
> > > > > platform driver. It's a bit confusing to see it's config in the menu at
> > > > > some separated place with no reference to the platform code. Let's move the
> > > > > config definition to be below the I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM config and mark
> > > > > it with "depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM" statement. By doing so the
> > > > > config menu will display the feature right below the DW I2C platform
> > > > > driver item and will indent it to the right so signifying its belonging.
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> > > > >  config I2C_DESIGNWARE_BAYTRAIL
> > > > >  	bool "Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore support"
> > > > >  	depends on ACPI
> > > > > +	depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM
> > > > >  	depends on (I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=m && IOSF_MBI) || \
> > > > >  		   (I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM=y && IOSF_MBI=y)
> > > > 
> > > > I didn't get this. What is broken now with existing dependencies?
> > > 
> > > With no explicit "depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM" the entry isn't right
> > > shifted with respect to the I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM config entry in the kernel
> > > menuconfig. So it looks like a normal no-yes driver without it. 
> > 
> > I didn't get. Is there problems with current case? (I don't see it).
> > If there is a problem, it should have a separate patch and commit message.
> > 
> > As for now above excerpt seems redundant and unneeded churn.
> 
> Please read the commit log more carefully.
> 
> Without explicit "depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM" you'd see the DW
> I2C-related menuconfig as:
> [*] Synopsys DesignWare Platform
> [ ] Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore support
> with that "depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM" added:
> [*] Synopsys DesignWare Platform
> [ ]     Intel Baytrail I2C semaphore support
> The second case presents the Baytrail semaphore as the DW I2C platform
> feature. Otherwise it's just a simple menuentry. As I see it without adding
> the explicit "depends on I2C_DESIGNWARE_PLATFORM" there is no need in moving
> the config at all.

Thanks for explanation, this makes sense.


> So if you think it's a churn. Well, I'll wait for
> Jarkko' comment in this regard.
> 
> BTW Jarkko asked in v3 whether it would work with just explicit "depends on"
> without if-endif enclosing the config.
> 
> -Sergey
> 
> > 
> > -- 
> > With Best Regards,
> > Andy Shevchenko
> > 
> > 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko