回复: [PATCH v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()

[Zhang, Qiang]

Thanks for your guide.
I will try to change the weakness of weak wording.

________________________________________
发件人: Zhang, Qiang <Qiang.Zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
发送时间: 2020年5月28日 9:41
收件人: Markus Elfring; Tejun Heo; Lai Jiangshan
抄送: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: 回复: [PATCH v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()

Thanks for your guide. I tried to change the weakness of weak wording


________________________________
发件人: linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-kernel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 代表 Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>
发送时间: 2020年5月27日 16:20
收件人: Zhang, Qiang <Qiang.Zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>; Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@xxxxxxxxx>
抄送: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
主题: Re: [PATCH v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()

> Thus delete this function call which became unnecessary with the referenced
> software update.
…
> Suggested-by: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx>

Would the tag “Co-developed-by” be more appropriate according to the patch review
to achieve a more pleasing commit message?


>  v1->v2->v3->v4->v5:
>  Modify weakly submitted information.

Now I wonder about your wording choice “weakly”.

Regards,
Markus