Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] sysctl: Add register_sysctl_init() interface

[Luis Chamberlain]

On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 11:31:08AM +0800, Xiaoming Ni wrote:
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c
> +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -3358,6 +3358,25 @@ int __init sysctl_init(void)
>  	kmemleak_not_leak(hdr);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +/*
> + * The sysctl interface is used to modify the interface value,
> + * but the feature interface has default values. Even if register_sysctl fails,
> + * the feature body function can also run. At the same time, malloc small
> + * fragment of memory during the system initialization phase, almost does
> + * not fail. Therefore, the function return is designed as void
> + */

Let's use kdoc while at it. Can you convert this to proper kdoc?

> +void __init register_sysctl_init(const char *path, struct ctl_table *table,
> +				 const char *table_name)
> +{
> +	struct ctl_table_header *hdr = register_sysctl(path, table);
> +
> +	if (unlikely(!hdr)) {
> +		pr_err("failed when register_sysctl %s to %s\n", table_name, path);
> +		return;

table_name is only used for this, however we can easily just make
another _register_sysctl_init() helper first, and then use a macro
which will concatenate this to something useful if you want to print
a string. I see no point in the description for this, specially since
the way it was used was not to be descriptive, but instead just a name
followed by some underscore and something else.

> +	}
> +	kmemleak_not_leak(hdr);

Is it *wrong* to run kmemleak_not_leak() when hdr was not allocated?
If so, can you fix the sysctl __init call itself?

PS. Since you have given me your series, feel free to send me a patch
as a follow up to this in privae and I can integrate it into my tree.

  Luis